A comparative study of semiempirical, ab initio, and DFT methods in evaluating metal-ligand bond strength, proton...

Although theoretical methods are now available which give very accurate results, often comparable to the experimental ones, modeling chemical or biological interesting systems often requires less demanding and less accurate theoretical methods, mainly due to computer limitations. Therefore, it is crucial to know the precision of such less reliable methods for relevant models and data. This has been done in this work for small zinc-active site models including O- (H(2)O and OH(-)) and N-donor (NH(3) and imidazole) ligands. Calculations using a number of quantum mechanical methods were carried out to determine their precision for geometries, coordination number relative stability, metal-ligand bond strengths, proton affinities, and interaction energies between first and second shell ligands. We have found that obtaining chemical accuracy can be as straightforward as HF geometry optimization with a double-zeta plus polarization basis followed by a B3LYP energy calculation with a triple-zeta quality basis set including diffuse and polarization functions. The use of levels as low as PM3 geometry optimization followed by a B3LYP single-point energy calculation with a double-zeta quality basis including polarization functions already yields useful trends in bond length, proton affinities or bond dissociation energies, provided that appropriate caution is taken with the optimized structures. The reliability of these levels of calculation has been successfully demonstrated for real biomimetic cases.