Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Processing resources in timing and sequencing tasks.

Scott W Brown1, Stephanie M Merchant

  • 1Department of Psychology, University of Southern Maine, Portland, Maine 04104-9300, USA. swbrown@usm.maine.edu

Perception & Psychophysics
|August 4, 2007
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Surgical Blowhole Incision for Acute Subcutaneous Emphysema: A Novel Approach With Negative-Pressure Wound Therapy.

Cureus·2025
Same author

Evaluation of a REDCap-based Workflow for Supporting Federal Guidance for Electronic Informed Consent.

AMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science proceedings. AMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science·2019
Same author

Relation between temporal perception and inhibitory control in the Go/No-Go task.

Acta psychologica·2016
Same author

Executive attentional resources in timing: Effects of inhibitory control and cognitive aging.

Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance·2015
Same author

Implementing a Clinical Research Management System: One Institution's Successful Approach Following Previous Failures.

AMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science proceedings. AMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science·2015
Same author

Time perception and temporal order memory.

Acta psychologica·2014
Same journal

Response organization in selective adaptation to speech sounds.

Perception & psychophysics·2014
Same journal

Reaction times to comparisons within and across phonetic categories.

Perception & psychophysics·2012
Same journal

Auditory and phonetic memory codes in the discrimination of consonants and vowels.

Perception & psychophysics·2012
Same journal

Simple and contingent adaptation effects for place of articulation in stop consonants.

Perception & psychophysics·2012
Same journal

Auditory property detectors and processing place features in stop consonants.

Perception & psychophysics·2012
Same journal

Visual working memory for line orientations and face identities.

Perception & psychophysics·2008
See all related articles

Cognitive timing and sequencing tasks interfere with each other, suggesting they share common attentional resources. This dual-task interference impacts performance in both time perception and sequence perception.

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Neuroscience
  • Human Performance

Background:

  • Understanding the cognitive processes underlying time and sequence perception is crucial for explaining human performance.
  • Investigating the interplay between different cognitive tasks can elucidate shared neural and attentional mechanisms.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To examine the interference patterns between timing and sequencing tasks when performed concurrently.
  • To determine if time perception and sequence perception rely on a common set of attentional resources.

Main Methods:

  • Subjects performed timing (5-sec temporal productions) and sequencing (reasoning verification or event monitoring) tasks under single-task and dual-task conditions across two experiments.
  • Bidirectional interference was assessed by comparing performance metrics (variability, duration, response time, sensitivity) between conditions.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • Concurrent sequencing tasks increased variability and duration of temporal productions.
  • Concurrent timing tasks slowed response times and reduced detection sensitivity for sequencing tasks.
  • Evidence of bidirectional interference between timing and sequencing tasks was observed.

Conclusions:

  • Time perception and sequence perception are not independent cognitive processes.
  • These processes likely share a common pool of attentional resources, leading to interference when performed concurrently.