Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Can children resist making interpretations when uncertain?

Sarah R Beck1, Elizabeth J Robinson, Megan M Freeth

  • 1School of Psychology, University of Birmingham, Birmingham B15 2TT, UK. s.r.beck@bham.ac.uk

Journal of Experimental Child Psychology
|August 4, 2007
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Measuring oral COVID-19 antiviral effectiveness using linked Australian data: Challenges and opportunities.

Journal of infection and public health·2026
Same author

Patterns of use of oral antivirals for COVID-19 in people 70 years and over in Victoria, Australia: a linked data study.

BMC infectious diseases·2026
Same author

Counterfactual relief.

Memory & cognition·2025
Same author

The developmental trajectories of implicit and explicit metacognitive monitoring and control in cued recall.

Journal of experimental child psychology·2025
Same author

Inequities in COVID-19 antiviral dispensation in Victoria, Australia: A retrospective cohort study using linked data.

Australian journal of general practice·2025
Same author

An experimental investigation of the effects of anticipating regret and relief on intentions and decisions to get the influenza vaccination.

Social science & medicine (1982)·2025
Same journal

The interplay between Theory of Mind inferencing and visual attention in narrative comprehension in autistic preschoolers.

Journal of experimental child psychology·2026
Same journal

Executive function and preschoolers' responses to severe transgressions: implications for early forgiveness.

Journal of experimental child psychology·2026
Same journal

Shared cognitive risk factors underlying rapid automatized naming deficits for the comorbidity of developmental dyslexia and attention deficit hyperactivity disorder: A computational parameter estimation via Bundesen's theory of visual attention.

Journal of experimental child psychology·2026
Same journal

Do young children understand the objectivity of reality?

Journal of experimental child psychology·2026
Same journal

Learning words by ear or by eye: effects of modality on lexical configuration and lexicalization.

Journal of experimental child psychology·2026
Same journal

Thinking outside the Box: Causal uncertainty motivates children's over-imitation.

Journal of experimental child psychology·2026
See all related articles

Young children struggle with ambiguous information, especially when deciding how to interpret it. Older children aged 7-8 can handle this better, showing improved cognitive flexibility in decision-making.

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Development
  • Child Psychology
  • Decision-Making Research

Background:

  • Children's understanding of ambiguity is crucial for cognitive development.
  • Previous research highlights challenges in children's ability to evaluate uncertain information.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate young children's capacity for response delay when faced with ambiguous input.
  • To differentiate the effects of ambiguity interpretation versus strategic decision-making on children's performance.

Main Methods:

  • Two experiments were conducted with children aged 5-8 years.
  • Experiment 1 assessed performance on tasks requiring interpretation of ambiguous input versus explicit knowledge evaluation.
  • Experiment 2 evaluated performance on a response-delay task without the need for strategy selection.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • Five- and 6-year-olds performed poorly when needing to choose between interpreting ambiguous input and delaying response.
  • Seven- and 8-year-olds successfully managed the task of interpreting ambiguous input.
  • Five- and 6-year-olds performed well when response delay was required, but strategy choice was removed.

Conclusions:

  • Young children's difficulties with ambiguity stem from the decision-making demands of different tasks.
  • The cognitive load associated with choosing between interpretive strategies poses a significant challenge for early childhood development.
  • Intervention strategies should focus on simplifying decision-making processes when introducing ambiguous information to young children.