Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 13, 2026

Three-Dimensional Echocardiographic Method for the Visualization and Assessment of Specific Parameters of the Pulmonary Veins
Published on: October 28, 2020
SPECT versus planar gated blood pool imaging for left ventricular evaluation
François Harel1, Vincent Finnerty, Quam Ngo
1Department of Nuclear Medicine, Montreal Heart Institute and Université de Montréal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada. francois_harel@hotmail.com
A new segmentation algorithm using invariance of the Laplacian (IL) accurately computes left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF). This method offers comparable results to standard planar analysis and the QBS algorithm, without bias related to LVEF magnitude.
Area of Science:
- Nuclear medicine imaging
- Cardiovascular imaging analysis
- Medical image processing
Background:
- A novel segmentation algorithm based on invariance of the Laplacian (IL) was developed.
- The algorithm aims to compute volumes and ejection fractions from medical imaging data.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the performance of the new IL algorithm.
- To compare its results against planar analysis and a standard algorithm (QBS) for accuracy in calculating left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF).
Main Methods:
- Single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) blood pool acquisition was performed in 202 patients.
- Left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) was calculated using the new IL algorithm, the standard QBS algorithm, and planar analysis (gold standard).
- Statistical analyses included correlation, Bland-Altman analysis, and linear regression to compare the methods.
Main Results:
- The IL algorithm showed a strong correlation with planar LVEF (r = 0.84), outperforming QBS (r = 0.77).
- Mean LVEF values were comparable across all methods (Planar: 32.72%, QBS: 32.32%, IL: 31.93%; P = .16).
- Bland-Altman analysis indicated negligible systematic bias for both 3D methods, with IL showing a smaller standard error of bias (7.44% vs. 9.36% for QBS) and no significant bias-LVEF correlation (P = .47).
Conclusions:
- The new IL segmentation algorithm provides results comparable to QBS and planar analysis for LVEF calculation.
- Unlike the QBS method, the IL algorithm demonstrated no correlation between the difference in LVEF and the magnitude of LVEF, suggesting improved accuracy across the spectrum of ejection fractions.
Related Concept Videos
Imaging Studies for Cardiovascular System II:Types of Echocardiography
Types of Echocardiography
Transthoracic Echocardiography (TTE)
TTE is the most common type of echocardiogram which involves placing a transducer on the patient's chest, emitting sound waves to create heart images. TTE is invaluable for evaluating the heart's size, structure, and motion, making it particularly useful for diagnosing...
Imaging Studies for Cardiovascular System I:Echocardiography
Indications: Echocardiography is utilized to diagnose heart failure, valve disorders, and myocardial infarction. It also assesses cardiac structures' size, shape, and motion, evaluates...

