Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Linguistic and spatial information for action.

Angela Bartolo1, Alexia Weisbecker, Yann Coello

  • 1Laboratoire URECA & UMR-CNRS 8163 STL, Université Charles-de-Gaulle Lille3, BP 149, F. 59653 Villeneuve d'Ascq cedex, France.

Behavioural Brain Research
|August 8, 2007
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Visual attention towards virtual humans as a function of spatial distance and emotional expression: an eye-tracking study.

Psychological research·2026
Same author

Impact of cognitive load on pupil dilation: A comparative study of young and older adults.

Biological psychology·2026
Same author

Semantic Modulation of Spatial Judgments in Augmented Reality: Evidence from fNIRS.

Brain topography·2025
Same author

The neural bases of meaningful intransitive gestures: A meta-analysis of lesion and fMRI studies.

Neuroscience and biobehavioral reviews·2025
Same author

Object Ownership Processing in Peripersonal Space: An Electroencephalographic Study.

Journal of cognitive neuroscience·2025
Same author

Sound-based rehabilitation of unilateral spatial neglect: A systematic review of the literature.

Applied neuropsychology. Adult·2025
Same journal

Understanding vulnerability through variability: a longitudinal twin study linking sex differences in neurodiversity, neurodevelopment and X-linked genetic mechanisms.

Behavioural brain research·2026
Same journal

Hippocampal plasticity predicts behavioral lateralization and stress resilience in laying hen chicks.

Behavioural brain research·2026
Same journal

Effects of Retatrutide on Learning and Memory in Streptozotocin-Induced Male Diabetic Rats.

Behavioural brain research·2026
Same journal

Bacopa-Enriched Formulation Enhances Memory and Synaptic Plasticity in a Rat Model of Vascular Dementia.

Behavioural brain research·2026
Same journal

Prior exposure to methylphenidate attenuates ethanol-induced conditioned place preference in zebrafish.

Behavioural brain research·2026
Same journal

Plasma nectin-4 levels are associated with changes in executive function in patients with methamphetamine use disorder undergoing treatment.

Behavioural brain research·2026
See all related articles

Visual processing streams interact early, with spatial information significantly interfering with linguistic responses. This suggests competition between the ventral and dorsal visual streams influences action selection.

Area of Science:

  • Neuroscience
  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Visual Perception

Background:

  • Motor responses are guided by semantic (ventral stream) or spatial (dorsal stream) attributes, with distinct temporal constraints.
  • The interaction between semantic and spatial information during linguistic response selection remains under-explored.
  • It is unclear if motor responses to linguistic stimuli are affected by concurrent spatial information.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the influence of spatial information on motor responses to linguistic stimuli.
  • To examine the reverse: the effect of linguistic information on responses to spatial stimuli.
  • To determine if spatial information interferes with linguistic response selection and vice-versa.

Main Methods:

  • Participants performed right-left motor responses to linguistic and spatial stimuli.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Congruent and incongruent spatial information was presented concurrently with linguistic stimuli.
  • Reaction times and response accuracy were measured under different conditions.

    • Main Results:

    • Responding to linguistic stimuli took longer than responding to spatial stimuli.
    • Linguistic information did not interfere with spatial response accuracy or reaction time.
    • Spatial information significantly interfered with linguistic responses, increasing reaction time and causing misdirected responses, particularly with incongruent stimuli (300-500 ms).
    • Correct responses to linguistic stimuli tended to deviate from distracting spatial cues.

    Conclusions:

    • Response selection is susceptible to irrelevant visual information.
    • Ventral and dorsal visual stream information compete early, influenced by temporal constraints, to guide action.
    • This competition highlights the dynamic interplay between semantic and spatial processing in motor control.