Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Visual estimation under risk.

Michael S Landy1, Ross Goutcher, Julia Trommershäuser

  • 1Department of Psychology, New York University, New York, NY 10003, USA. landy@nyu.edu

Journal of Vision
|August 10, 2007
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

When is "now"? In the past to compensate for the sensation of time or in the future as a prediction of the temporal sensory horizon?

The Behavioral and brain sciences·2026
Same author

Normalization accounts for temporal dynamics in human somatosensory cortex.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2026
Same author

Natural scene segmentation dynamics reveal iterative Bayesian inference.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2026
Same author

Visual confidence accurately tracks increasing internal noise with eccentricity in peripheral vision.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2026
Same author

Low confidence for perceptual completion of partially occluded objects.

Journal of vision·2026
Same author

Implicit adaptation's effect on sensorimotor and motor confidence.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2025
Same journal

Analysis of human visual experience data.

Journal of vision·2026
Same journal

Pyramid-based Bayesian modeling for high-resolution behavioral analysis.

Journal of vision·2026
Same journal

Sensation without perception: The white whale effect and perceptual blindness in autonomous vehicles.

Journal of vision·2026
Same journal

Gaze behavior during closed-captioned movie viewing adapts to absent audio through more frequent switching between text and scene.

Journal of vision·2026
Same journal

In pursuit of saccade awareness: Limited volitional control and minimal conscious access to catch-up saccades during smooth pursuit eye movements.

Journal of vision·2026
Same journal

Dissociable effects of element-lifetime and stimulus-duration on local and global motion processing: An equivalent noise study.

Journal of vision·2026
See all related articles

This study examined how people use visual uncertainty in decision-making tasks. While some participants optimized their choices for rewards and penalties, others struggled with unpredictable visual information.

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive psychology
  • Computational neuroscience
  • Decision science

Background:

  • Perceptual estimation tasks often involve uncertainty.
  • Understanding how individuals integrate visual uncertainty with explicit rewards and penalties is crucial for decision-making models.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate whether observers optimally account for visual uncertainty in a perceptual estimation task with explicit rewards and penalties.
  • To compare human performance against a model that maximizes expected gain (MEG).

Main Methods:

  • Participants judged the mean orientation of line segment textures.
  • A betting strategy was employed using reward and penalty regions.
  • Stimulus mean and variance varied across trials.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • The ideal strategy predicts payoff display adjustments based on perceived orientation, penalty size, and stimulus variability.
  • Some subjects performed near-optimally.
  • High and unpredictable stimulus variability led to suboptimal strategies in some participants.

Conclusions:

  • Human decision-making in perceptual tasks can be near-optimal but is susceptible to suboptimal strategies under high visual uncertainty.
  • The degree of optimal performance depends on factors like penalty magnitude and stimulus variability.