Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Attention and visual texture segregation.

Sven P Heinrich1, Marta Andrés, Michael Bach

  • 1Sektion Funktionelle Sehforschung, Universitäts-Augenklinik Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany. sven.heinrich@uni-freiburg.de

Journal of Vision
|August 10, 2007
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Feasibility of lung imaging at 0.55T for assessment of interstitial lung disease in patients with pulmonary sarcoidosis.

European radiology·2026
Same author

AI-Based Opportunistic CT Risk Assessment Using TotalSegmentator in Osteoporotic Vertebral Fractures.

Journal of imaging informatics in medicine·2026
Same author

Assessing Visual Function in Retinal Gene Therapy.

Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.)·2026
Same author

AI-Based Myocardial Segmentation and Attenuation Mapping Improved Detection of Myocardial Ischemia and Infarction on Emergency CT Angiography.

Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland)·2026
Same author

Impact of CT dose on AI performance: A comparison of radiomics, deep, and foundation models in a multicentric anthropomorphic phantom study.

Medical physics·2026
Same author

Corrigendum to 'Volatile pyrethroid spatial repellents for preventing mosquito bites: a systematic review and meta-analysis' EBioMedicine Volatile pyrethroid spatial repellents for preventing mosquito bites: a systematic review and meta-analysis 119 (2025) 105891/10.1016/j.ebiom.2025.105891 Sep: 119: 105891.

EBioMedicine·2025
Same journal

Analysis of human visual experience data.

Journal of vision·2026
Same journal

Pyramid-based Bayesian modeling for high-resolution behavioral analysis.

Journal of vision·2026
Same journal

Sensation without perception: The white whale effect and perceptual blindness in autonomous vehicles.

Journal of vision·2026
Same journal

Gaze behavior during closed-captioned movie viewing adapts to absent audio through more frequent switching between text and scene.

Journal of vision·2026
Same journal

In pursuit of saccade awareness: Limited volitional control and minimal conscious access to catch-up saccades during smooth pursuit eye movements.

Journal of vision·2026
Same journal

Dissociable effects of element-lifetime and stimulus-duration on local and global motion processing: An equivalent noise study.

Journal of vision·2026
See all related articles

Attention impacts later stages of visual texture segregation, not early ones. Task relevance is crucial for these later processes, suggesting a top-down influence on visual perception.

Area of Science:

  • Neuroscience
  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Visual Perception

Background:

  • Visual texture segregation is traditionally considered a preattentive process.
  • Emerging evidence suggests attention significantly influences texture segregation.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the role of attention in visual texture segregation using visual evoked potentials (VEPs).
  • To determine how different attentional tasks affect the neural processing of texture segregation.

Main Methods:

  • Utilized Gabor-filtered binary noise patterns to create homogeneous and segregated texture stimuli.
  • Measured VEPs under four task conditions: attending to global pattern, local structure, numbers, or tones.
  • Calculated texture segregation-specific VEPs by differencing responses to homogeneous and segregated stimuli.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • Texture segregation responses showed two main occipital negativities at ~110 ms and ~230 ms.
  • The early negativity (~110 ms) was unaffected by the attentional task.
  • The later negativity (~230 ms) was abolished when attention was directed to non-visual stimuli (numbers or tones).

Conclusions:

  • Early visual texture segregation processing appears independent of attention.
  • Later stages of texture segregation are modulated by task relevance and attentional focus.
  • Findings support a recurrent processing model involving bottom-up and top-down information flow, with attention influencing later modulatory stages.