Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Motor cortex stimulation for neuropathic pain.

Y Lazorthes1, J C Sol, S Fowo

  • 1Department of Neuroscience, Unit of Stereotactic and Functional Neurosurgery, CHU Rangueil Toulouse, France. ylazorth@cict.fr

Acta Neurochirurgica. Supplement
|August 19, 2007
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Pro-ictal, rather than pre-ictal, brain state marked by global critical slowing and local gamma power increase.

Clinical neurophysiology : official journal of the International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology·2025
Same author

Effect of meditation on intracerebral EEG in a patient with temporal lobe epilepsy: A case report.

Explore (New York, N.Y.)·2020
Same author

Cervical laminectomy and micro resection of the posterior venous plexus in Hirayama disease.

Neuro-Chirurgie·2018
Same author

Subventricular zone involvement at recurrence is a strong predictive factor of outcome following high grade glioma reirradiation.

Journal of neuro-oncology·2017
Same author

Micropatterned bioimplant with guided neuronal cells to promote tissue reconstruction and improve functional recovery after primary motor cortex insult.

Biomaterials·2015
Same author

Adult human progenitor cells from the temporal lobe: another source of neuronal cells.

Brain injury·2012
Same journal

Microneurosurgical Training on Simulators: The Zurich Microsurgery Lab Experience.

Acta neurochirurgica. Supplement·2025
Same journal

Educational Impact of an Annotation System Integrated with an Exoscope for Cerebral Aneurysm Surgery: Case Description.

Acta neurochirurgica. Supplement·2025
Same journal

Artificial Intelligence and Augmented Reality in Vascular Neurosurgery.

Acta neurochirurgica. Supplement·2025
Same journal

Experiences with and Practical Implications of Using a Hybrid Operating Room.

Acta neurochirurgica. Supplement·2025
Same journal

Epidemiology and Aetiology of Cerebral Cavernous Malformations.

Acta neurochirurgica. Supplement·2025
Same journal

Novel Hemodynamic Parameters for Cerebral Ischemia in Patients with Occlusive Cerebrovascular Disease Using Dual ASL Perfusion Imaging.

Acta neurochirurgica. Supplement·2025
See all related articles

Epidural motor cortex stimulation (MCS) offers a promising surgical option for refractory neuropathic pain. Accurate electrode placement and stimulation programming are key to its effectiveness, though mechanisms require further study.

Area of Science:

  • Neurosurgery
  • Pain Management
  • Neurology

Background:

  • Epidural motor cortex stimulation (MCS) has emerged as a surgical treatment for refractory neuropathic pain since 1991.
  • Its precise mechanism of action remains incompletely understood, necessitating further research.
  • Optimal patient selection criteria and predictive value of diagnostic tests for MCS efficacy are not yet established.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To review the literature on epidural motor cortex stimulation for central and neuropathic pain over the past 15 years.
  • To discuss the technical advancements and challenges in patient selection and electrode placement.
  • To evaluate the efficacy of MCS for various pain conditions and identify factors influencing outcomes.

Main Methods:

  • Literature review of studies published over the last 15 years concerning central and neuropathic pain treated with MCS.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Analysis of factors influencing MCS efficacy, including patient selection, surgical technique, and stimulation parameters.
  • Discussion of current and future research directions, including multicentered randomized trials.

    • Main Results:

    • MCS is a potential treatment of choice for post-stroke pain, thalamic pain, and facial anesthesia dolorosa.
    • For brachial plexus avulsion pain, dorsal root entry zone (DREZ)-tomy is preferred initially, with MCS as a secondary option.
    • MCS shows promising results for phantom limb pain, contingent on precise electrode placement and optimized stimulation programming.

    Conclusions:

    • Accurate electrode placement and sophisticated stimulation programming are critical for successful MCS outcomes.
    • Further research, particularly multicentered randomized studies, is needed to elucidate MCS mechanisms and refine clinical applications.
    • Understanding MCS mechanisms will enable better adjustment of stimulation parameters for improved patient management.