Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Search research articles

Related Experiment Videos

Multiple object juggling: changing what is tracked during extended multiple object tracking.

Jeremy M Wolfe¹, Skyler S Place, Todd S Horowitz

¹Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, wolfe@search.bwh.harvard.edu

Psychonomic Bulletin & Review

|August 19, 2007

Summary

This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

Making time for a dynamic attentional priority map.

Trends in cognitive sciences·2026

Same author

Biasmapping: Idiosyncratic covert search in the vicinity of fixation.

Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance·2026

Same author

The Shape of Saccade-based Functional Visual Fields (FVFs): A cautionary note.

Attention, perception & psychophysics·2026

Same author

A common signal-strength factor limits awareness and precise knowledge of multiple moving objects across the adult lifespan.

Cognition·2026

Same author

Incidental Learning of Temporal and Spatial Associations in Hybrid Search.

Visual cognition·2025

Same author

Mixed hybrid visual foraging is near optimal.

Attention, perception & psychophysics·2025

Same journal

Mind wandering during first- and foreign-language reading.

Psychonomic bulletin & review·2026

Same journal

Lexical word processing is unaffected by rapid invisible frequency tagging in reading: Evidence from eye movements.

Psychonomic bulletin & review·2026

Same journal

Anxiety modulates voluntary attentional orienting to emotional gaze cues: Eye movements for pro- and anti-saccades.

Psychonomic bulletin & review·2026

Same journal

Faster key-press responses to front vowels than back vowels when matching heard vowels with represented vowels.

Psychonomic bulletin & review·2026

Same journal

Testing the interleaving effect without response bias: A forced-choice reevaluation of Kornell and Bjork (2008).

Psychonomic bulletin & review·2026

Same journal

The impact of social interaction on abstract concepts.

Psychonomic bulletin & review·2026

See all related articles

Multiple object tracking (MOT) performance is maintained for up to 10 minutes when observers can dynamically update tracked items. Without feedback, sustained attention to multiple objects degrades over time.

Area of Science:

Cognitive psychology
Neuroscience
Visual attention research

Background:

The multiple object tracking (MOT) task models visual resource deployment.
MOT is a key paradigm for understanding sustained attention.
Real-world tracking differs from lab MOT due to dynamic item sets and longer durations.

Purpose of the Study:

To investigate the limits of MOT performance over extended durations.
To examine the impact of dynamic item set changes on tracking.
To determine the role of feedback in maintaining long-term MOT.

Main Methods:

Four experiments were conducted to assess MOT.
Participants tracked multiple objects for up to 10 minutes.
Conditions varied regarding item set stability and feedback availability.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

Observers sustained MOT performance for up to 10 minutes.
Dynamic updating of tracked objects incurred minimal cost.
Performance declined significantly without implicit or explicit feedback.

Conclusions:

Sustained multiple object tracking is feasible for extended periods.
Dynamic management of tracked sets is a key capability.
Feedback is crucial for maintaining tracking accuracy over time.