Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Testing the race model inequality: an algorithm and computer programs.

Rolf Ulrich1, Jeff Miller, Hannes Schröter

  • 1University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany. ulrich@uni-tuebingen.de

Behavior Research Methods
|August 19, 2007
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

A sequential model of two-choice intensity identification.

Frontiers in cognition·2026
Same author

What is prepared in temporal preparation? A review and a historical appreciation.

Frontiers in psychology·2026
Same author

[Doping in recreational sports].

Bundesgesundheitsblatt, Gesundheitsforschung, Gesundheitsschutz·2026
Same author

Ten years Diffusion Model for Conflict (DMC) tasks: Theoretical foundations, applications, practical recommendations, and open challenges.

Psychonomic bulletin & review·2026
Same author

The time-intensity uncertainty principle in vision.

Attention, perception & psychophysics·2026
Same author

Internal reference updating in visual duration discrimination: A search for boundary conditions : Internal reference updating.

Attention, perception & psychophysics·2026
Same journal

Planned missingness in intensive longitudinal studies: Extensions and comparisons of multiform designs.

Behavior research methods·2026
Same journal

A validity-guided workflow for robust large language model research in psychology.

Behavior research methods·2026
Same journal

Are 7-point Likert scales preferable to 5-point scales in language research?

Behavior research methods·2026
Same journal

Generative psychometrics via AI-GENIE: Automatic item generation and validation with network-integrated evaluation.

Behavior research methods·2026
Same journal

Exploring psychological tradeoffs: Developing and demonstrating an R Shiny app for Pareto optimization.

Behavior research methods·2026
Same journal

The performance of Bayesian fit measures in detecting misspecified multilevel structural equation modeling.

Behavior research methods·2026
See all related articles

Faster reaction times in divided-attention tasks occur when stimuli are redundant. A race model explains this by suggesting responses are triggered by the fastest of two detection processes. This study provides an algorithm to test this race model inequality.

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Psychophysics
  • Human Factors

Background:

  • Divided-attention tasks show faster responses with redundant target stimuli.
  • The redundant-targets effect is often explained by race models.
  • Race models predict a specific relationship between reaction time distributions, known as the race model inequality.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To describe a precise algorithm for testing the race model inequality.
  • To provide computational tools (MATLAB routines and Pascal program) for implementing the algorithm.
  • To facilitate empirical testing of race model predictions in cognitive psychology.

Main Methods:

  • Development of a novel algorithm to assess the race model inequality.
  • Implementation of the algorithm in MATLAB and Pascal programming languages.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Focus on the statistical properties of reaction time distributions.

    • Main Results:

    • The study presents a validated algorithm for testing the race model inequality.
    • The provided routines enable researchers to empirically test race model predictions.
    • The algorithm offers a precise method for analyzing redundant-targets effects.

    Conclusions:

    • The developed algorithm and associated programs offer a robust tool for cognitive researchers.
    • This work aids in the validation and refinement of race models of attention.
    • Accurate testing of the race model inequality is crucial for understanding divided-attention mechanisms.