Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 13, 2026

08:45
Shrinkage of Dental Composite in Simulated Cavity Measured with Digital Image Correlation
Published on: July 21, 2014
A study of microleakage in Class II composite restorations using four different curing techniques
Naghmeh Gharizadeh1, Kazhal Moradi, Mohammad Hossein Haghighizadeh
1Department of Operative and Esthetic Dentistry, School of Dentistry, Jundishapour University of Medical Sciences, Ahwaz, Iran. gharizadehn@yahoo.com
Operative Dentistry
|August 19, 2007
Summary
This study found that using light-conducting instruments with metal matrices significantly reduces microleakage in posterior composite restorations. Metal matrices with light tips or bio-glass cylinders showed less leakage than standard metal matrices.
Area of Science:
- Restorative Dentistry
- Dental Materials Science
- Biomaterials Engineering
Background:
- Class II composite restorations are prone to clinical failures, often due to marginal microleakage.
- Incremental placement techniques aim to improve the longevity and seal of posterior composite restorations.
- Microleakage at the gingival margin is a primary concern for the success of Class II restorations.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate and compare the microleakage of Class II composite restorations using four different incremental placement and curing techniques.
- To determine the effectiveness of various matrix systems and light-conducting instruments in minimizing marginal leakage.
- To assess the influence of gingival margin location (enamel vs. dentin) on microleakage.
Main Methods:
- Forty human premolars with Class II cavities were restored using a fiber-reinforced resin composite (Neulite F) and four distinct techniques.
- Techniques included variations in matrix type (metal, transparent), wedges (wooden, reflective), and the use of light-conducting instruments (light tip, bio-glass cylinder).
- Restorations underwent thermocycling, staining, sectioning, and stereomicroscopic evaluation for microleakage on a 0-4 scale.
Main Results:
- Group 1 (standard metal matrix with wooden wedge) exhibited the highest degree of microleakage.
- Groups 2, 3, and 4 demonstrated significantly less microleakage compared to Group 1.
- No significant difference in microleakage was observed between enamel and dentin gingival margin preparations.
Conclusions:
- Restoration of Class II cavities using metal matrices in conjunction with light-conducting instruments significantly reduces gingival margin microleakage.
- The use of light tips or bio-glass cylinders appears to enhance the marginal seal of posterior composite restorations.
- Proper matrix selection and light curing techniques are crucial for minimizing microleakage and improving the clinical performance of composite restorations.