Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 13, 2026

06:44
Age-dependent Dynamics of Locomotion in Caenorhabditis elegans: A Lyapunov Exponent Analysis
Published on: September 23, 2025
The effects of irregular sampling and missing data on largest Lyapunov exponents
David M Kreindler1, Charles J Lumsden
1University of Toronto, Ontario, Canada. david.kreindler@utoronto.ca
Nonlinear Dynamics, Psychology, and Life Sciences
|August 19, 2007
Summary
Calculating the largest Lyapunov exponent (λ1) from irregular human self-report data is challenging. This study found that segment concatenation patching can accurately estimate λ1 even with 15-20% missing data points.
Area of Science:
- Dynamical Systems
- Time Series Analysis
- Computational Neuroscience
Background:
- Human self-report data often exhibit irregular sampling rates.
- Calculating the largest Lyapunov exponent (λ1), a chaos indicator, is difficult with such data.
Purpose of the Study:
- To assess methods for calculating λ1 from irregularly sampled time series data.
- To determine the impact of missing data and patching techniques on λ1 estimation.
Main Methods:
- Synthetic time series data were generated and subjected to data point removal (uniform random or power law).
- Missing data segments were patched using segment concatenation, average filling, or local phase space interpolation.
- λ1 was calculated for complete and patched datasets.
Main Results:
- Accurate λ1 estimation is possible with up to 15-20% missing data, depending on the system and patching method.
- Segment concatenation proved robust for self-similar data.
- Local phase space interpolation was effective but required substantial intact data.
Conclusions:
- Effective strategies exist for estimating λ1 from irregularly sampled time series.
- Data patching techniques, particularly segment concatenation, can preserve chaos dynamics.
- Careful consideration of data loss and patching methods is crucial for reliable λ1 calculation.
Related Concept Videos
Outliers and Influential Points
An outlier is an observation of data that does not fit the rest of the data. It is sometimes called an extreme value. When you graph an outlier, it will appear not to fit the pattern of the graph. Some outliers are due to mistakes (for example, writing down 50 instead of 500), while others may indicate that something unusual is happening. Outliers are present far from the least squares line in the vertical direction. They have large "errors," where the "error" or residual is the vertical...
Random Error
Random or indeterminate errors originate from various uncontrollable variables, such as variations in environmental conditions, instrument imperfections, or the inherent variability of the phenomena being measured. Usually, these errors cannot be predicted, estimated, or characterized because their direction and magnitude often vary in magnitude and direction even during consecutive measurements. As a result, they are difficult to eliminate. However, the aggregate effect of these errors can be...
Residuals and Least-Squares Property
The vertical distance between the actual value of y and the estimated value of y. In other words, it measures the vertical distance between the actual data point and the predicted point on the line
If the observed data point lies above the line, the residual is positive, and the line underestimates the actual data value for y. If the observed data point lies below the line, the residual is negative, and the line overestimates the actual data value for y.
The process of fitting the best-fit...
If the observed data point lies above the line, the residual is positive, and the line underestimates the actual data value for y. If the observed data point lies below the line, the residual is negative, and the line overestimates the actual data value for y.
The process of fitting the best-fit...
Systematic Error: Methodological and Sampling Errors
In the case of systematic errors, the sources can be identified, and the errors can be subsequently minimized by addressing these sources. According to the source, systematic errors can be divided into sampling, instrumental, methodological, and personal errors.
Sampling errors originate from improper sampling methods or the wrong sample population. These errors can be minimized by refining the sampling strategy. Defective instruments or faulty calibrations are the sources of instrumental...
Sampling errors originate from improper sampling methods or the wrong sample population. These errors can be minimized by refining the sampling strategy. Defective instruments or faulty calibrations are the sources of instrumental...
Sampling Distribution
Given simple random samples of size n from a given population with a measured characteristic such as mean, proportion, or standard deviation for each sample, the probability distribution of all the measured characteristics is called a sampling distribution. How much the statistic varies from one sample to another is known as the sampling variability of a statistic. You typically measure the sampling variability of a statistic by its standard error. The standard error of the mean is an example...
Random and Systematic Errors
Scientists always try their best to record measurements with the utmost accuracy and precision. However, sometimes errors do occur. These errors can be random or systematic. Random errors are observed due to the inconsistency or fluctuation in the measurement process, or variations in the quantity itself that is being measured. Such errors fluctuate from being greater than or less than the true value in repeated measurements. Consider a scientist measuring the length of an earthworm using a...

