Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Comments on the CASIA version 1.0 iris data set.

P Jonathon Phillips1, Kevin W Bowyer, Patrick J Flynn

  • 1National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, MD 20899-8940, USA. jonathon@nist.gov

IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence
|August 19, 2007
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Intergroup randomized phase III study of adjuvant FOLFIRI, FOLFOX, or 5-FU/leucovorin for stage II/III rectal cancer: ECOG-ACRIN E3201.

The oncologist·2025
Same author

The state of modelling face processing in humans with deep learning.

British journal of psychology (London, England : 1953)·2025
Same author

Perceptual Expertise of Forensic Examiners and Reviewers on Tests of Cross-Race and Disguised Face Identification and Face Memory.

Applied cognitive psychology·2024
Same author

Lessons from Collecting a Million Biometric Samples.

Image and vision computing·2024
Same author

How context shapes collective turnover over time: The relative impact of internal versus external factors.

The Journal of applied psychology·2024
Same author

Forensic facial examiners versus super-recognizers: Evaluating behavior beyond accuracy.

Applied cognitive psychology·2024
Same journal

Relation DETR+: Exploring Explicit Position Relation Prior for Dense Prediction.

IEEE transactions on pattern analysis and machine intelligence·2026
Same journal

RBF++: Quantifying and Optimizing Reasoning Boundaries across Measurable and Unmeasurable Capabilities for Chain-of-Thought Reasoning.

IEEE transactions on pattern analysis and machine intelligence·2026
Same journal

CAFE: Cross-View Adaptive Fusion and Cluster Center Enhancement for Robust Multi-View Clustering.

IEEE transactions on pattern analysis and machine intelligence·2026
Same journal

DIVER: Reinforced Diffusion Breaks Imitation Bottlenecks in End-to-End Autonomous Driving.

IEEE transactions on pattern analysis and machine intelligence·2026
Same journal

Ethics-Aware Safe Reinforcement Learning for Rare-Event Risk Control in Interactive Urban Driving.

IEEE transactions on pattern analysis and machine intelligence·2026
Same journal

Learning Shape Anchors for Holistic Indoor Scene Understanding.

IEEE transactions on pattern analysis and machine intelligence·2026
See all related articles

The CASIA version 1.0 iris dataset contains edited images, making it unsuitable for most iris biometrics research. Recommendations are provided for reporting iris recognition experiment results.

Area of Science:

  • Biometrics
  • Computer Vision
  • Pattern Recognition

Background:

  • The CASIA version 1.0 iris dataset is widely used in iris biometrics research.
  • Image preprocessing in datasets can significantly impact research outcomes.
  • Standardized reporting of experimental results is crucial for reproducibility.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the suitability of the CASIA version 1.0 iris dataset for iris biometrics research.
  • To provide recommendations for the appropriate use of datasets in iris recognition studies.
  • To suggest improvements for reporting methodologies in iris recognition experiments.

Main Methods:

  • Analysis of image characteristics in the CASIA version 1.0 iris dataset.
  • Review of methodologies used in the Iris Challenge Evaluation (ICE) 2005.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Formulation of guidelines for reporting iris recognition experiment results.

    • Main Results:

    • The CASIA version 1.0 iris dataset images have been altered, with the pupil area replaced by a uniform intensity circle.
    • This alteration compromises the integrity of the dataset for authentic iris biometrics research.
    • The study highlights the need for careful consideration of dataset properties and reporting standards.

    Conclusions:

    • The CASIA version 1.0 iris dataset should be avoided in iris biometrics research due to image modifications.
    • Researchers should critically assess datasets for potential biases or alterations.
    • Adherence to standardized reporting practices, as informed by projects like ICE 2005, is essential for advancing the field of iris recognition.