Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Ligand Binding and Linkage00:49

Ligand Binding and Linkage

5.5K
Allosteric proteins have more than one ligand binding site; the binding of a ligand to any of these sites influences the binding of ligands to the other sites. When a protein is allosteric, its binding sites are called coupled or linked.  In the case of enzymes, the site that binds to the substrate is known as the active site and the other site is known as the regulatory site. When a ligand binds to the regulatory site, this leads to conformational changes in the protein that can influence...
5.5K
Ligand Binding Sites02:40

Ligand Binding Sites

14.9K
Proteins are dynamic macromolecules that carry out a wide variety of essential processes; however, the activities of most proteins depend on their interactions with other molecules or ions, known as ligands.
Protein-ligand interactions are quite specific; even though numerous potential ligands surround a cellular protein at any given time, only a particular ligand can bind to that protein. Moreover, a ligand binds only to a dedicated area on the surface of the protein, known as the...
14.9K
Metal-Ligand Bonds02:51

Metal-Ligand Bonds

24.1K
The hemoglobin in the blood, the chlorophyll in green plants, vitamin B-12, and the catalyst used in the manufacture of polyethylene all contain coordination compounds. Ions of the metals, especially the transition metals, are likely to form complexes.
In these complexes, transition metals form coordinate covalent bonds, a kind of Lewis acid-base interaction in which both of the electrons in the bond are contributed by a donor (Lewis base) to an electron acceptor (Lewis acid). The Lewis acid in...
24.1K
Introduction to z Scores01:06

Introduction to z Scores

11.0K
A z score (or standardized value) is measured in units of the standard deviation. It tells you how many standard deviations the value x is above (to the right of) or below (to the left of) the mean, μ. Values of x that are larger than the mean have positive z scores, and values of x that are smaller than the mean have negative z scores. If x equals the mean, then x has a zero z score. It is important to note that the mean of the z scores is zero, and the standard deviation is one.
z scores...
11.0K
Introduction to z Scores01:05

Introduction to z Scores

1.3K
A z score (or standardized value) is measured in units of the standard deviation. It indicates how many standard deviations the value x is above (to the right of) or below (to the left of) the mean, μ. Values of x that are larger than the mean have positive z scores, and values of x that are smaller than the mean have negative z scores. If x equals the mean, then x has a zero z score. It is important to note that the mean of the z scores is zero, and the standard deviation is one.
z scores...
1.3K
z Scores and Area Under the Curve01:17

z Scores and Area Under the Curve

18.4K
z scores are the standardized values obtained after converting a normal distribution into a standard normal distribution. A z score is measured in units of the standard deviation. The z score tells you how many standard deviations the value x is above (to the right of) or below (to the left of) the mean, μ. Values of x that are larger than the mean have positive z scores, and values of x that are smaller than the mean have negative z scores. If x equals the mean, then x has a z score of...
18.4K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Functional inactivation of MDR3 caused by a homozygous <i>ABCB4</i> missense variant leading to liver failure.

Frontiers in genetics·2026
Same author

LignAmb25: A comprehensive AMBER force field addressing lignin's structural and chemical diversity.

Biophysical journal·2026
Same author

Mechanisms of APOBEC3 Packaging into HIV-1.

Viruses·2026
Same author

Integrative approaches for the structure-based functional understanding of the ethylene response in plants.

The Plant journal : for cell and molecular biology·2026
Same author

Chat-Driven Computational (Bio)chemistry: Using LLM Agents to Accelerate Bio- and Chemoinformatics.

Journal of chemical information and modeling·2026
Same author

G521 is the gatekeeper and a key transmembrane domain contact residue of <i>Candida albicans</i> Cdr1.

mBio·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jan 27, 2026

Evidence-based Knowledge Synthesis and Hypothesis Validation: Navigating Biomedical Knowledge Bases via Explainable AI and Agentic Systems
05:47

Evidence-based Knowledge Synthesis and Hypothesis Validation: Navigating Biomedical Knowledge Bases via Explainable AI and Agentic Systems

Published on: June 13, 2025

1.4K

DrugScoreRNA--knowledge-based scoring function to predict RNA-ligand interactions.

Patrick Pfeffer1, Holger Gohlke

  • 1Department of Biological Sciences, Molecular Bioinformatics Group, J.W. Goethe-University, Max-von-Laue-Strasse 9, Frankfurt 60438, Germany.

Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling
|August 21, 2007
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Researchers developed DrugScoreRNA, a novel scoring function for predicting RNA-ligand interactions. This tool enhances structure-based drug design by improving the accuracy of RNA-ligand docking and binding affinity predictions.

More Related Videos

An ELISA Based Binding and Competition Method to Rapidly Determine Ligand-receptor Interactions
08:40

An ELISA Based Binding and Competition Method to Rapidly Determine Ligand-receptor Interactions

Published on: March 14, 2016

20.1K
A Protocol for Computer-Based Protein Structure and Function Prediction
16:41

A Protocol for Computer-Based Protein Structure and Function Prediction

Published on: November 3, 2011

69.7K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jan 27, 2026

Evidence-based Knowledge Synthesis and Hypothesis Validation: Navigating Biomedical Knowledge Bases via Explainable AI and Agentic Systems
05:47

Evidence-based Knowledge Synthesis and Hypothesis Validation: Navigating Biomedical Knowledge Bases via Explainable AI and Agentic Systems

Published on: June 13, 2025

1.4K
An ELISA Based Binding and Competition Method to Rapidly Determine Ligand-receptor Interactions
08:40

An ELISA Based Binding and Competition Method to Rapidly Determine Ligand-receptor Interactions

Published on: March 14, 2016

20.1K
A Protocol for Computer-Based Protein Structure and Function Prediction
16:41

A Protocol for Computer-Based Protein Structure and Function Prediction

Published on: November 3, 2011

69.7K

Area of Science:

  • Computational chemistry
  • Structural biology
  • Drug discovery

Background:

  • RNA's growing importance as a drug target necessitates advanced structure-based drug design tools.
  • Current docking and scoring methods require improvement for accurate prediction of RNA-ligand interactions.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To develop a novel knowledge-based scoring function, DrugScoreRNA, for predicting RNA-ligand interactions.
  • To evaluate DrugScoreRNA's performance in predicting binding modes and affinities compared to existing tools.

Main Methods:

  • Derived distance-dependent pair potentials from 670 crystallographically determined nucleic acid-ligand and -protein complexes.
  • Applied DrugScoreRNA as an objective function for docking 31 RNA-ligand complexes and 20 NMR structures.
  • Predicted binding affinities for 15 RNA-ligand complexes and compared with experimental data.

Main Results:

  • DrugScoreRNA achieved "good" binding geometries (RMSD < 2 Å) in 42% of cases on the first rank, outperforming other methods.
  • Demonstrated robustness with good docking results for NMR structures not included in the knowledge base.
  • Showed a fair correlation (R S = 0.61) between computed and experimental binding affinities, sufficient for virtual screening.

Conclusions:

  • DrugScoreRNA is a robust and efficient tool for RNA-ligand docking and binding affinity prediction.
  • The developed potentials facilitate faster convergence to the global minimum during docking.
  • DrugScoreRNA offers superior predictive power, advancing structure-based drug design for RNA targets.