Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Screening of olfactory function using odourized markers.

J Vodicka1, A Pellant, V Chrobok

  • 1Department of Otorhinolaryngology & Head and Neck Surgery, Regional Hospital Pardubice, Pardubice, Czech Republic. jan_vodicka@centrum.cz

Rhinology
|August 22, 2007
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Extralobar pulmonary sequestration as an intraabdominal tumour.

Rozhledy v chirurgii : mesicnik Ceskoslovenske chirurgicke spolecnosti·2025
Same author

Clinical Efficacy of Enhanced Contact Endoscopy in Early Detection of Laryngeal Carcinoma: A Single Center Experience.

Journal of voice : official journal of the Voice Foundation·2025
Same author

Position paper on olfactory dysfunction: 2023

Rhinology·2023
Same author

Developing a core outcome set for clinical trials in olfactory disorders: a COMET initiative.

Rhinology·2023
Same author

Massive intrathoracic haemorrhage as a complication of pulmonary parenchymal haemorrhage and anticoagulant treatment of lung embolization during COVID-19 - two case reports.

Rozhledy v chirurgii : mesicnik Ceskoslovenske chirurgicke spolecnosti·2022
Same author

Delayed diagnosis of diaphragmatic rupture after blunt chest trauma - 2 case reports.

Rozhledy v chirurgii : mesicnik Ceskoslovenske chirurgicke spolecnosti·2022
Same journal

Real world efficacy of dupilumab in switchers versus biological naive CRSwNP patients.

Rhinology·2026
Same journal

Therapeutic outcomes of biologic switching in chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Rhinology·2026
Same journal

Association between chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and chronic rhinosinusitis: a longitudinal follow-up study using a national health insurance database.

Rhinology·2026
Same journal

Metropolitan air pollution and the upper and lower airway: chronic rhinosinusitis and asthma outpatient burden.

Rhinology·2026
Same journal

Impact of real-world confounders on the accuracy of an AI model to support read out of skin prick automated test results.

Rhinology·2026
Same journal

Factors influencing timing of cerebrospinal fluid leak after endoscopic skull base surgery: a multicenter study.

Rhinology·2026
See all related articles

A new screening test using odourized markers (OM) effectively identifies anosmia in the general population. This psychophysical test shows strong correlation with established methods, though precise olfactory function quantification is limited.

Area of Science:

  • Neuroscience
  • Psychophysics
  • Otorhinolaryngology

Background:

  • Olfactory dysfunction affects a significant portion of the population.
  • Developing accessible screening tools for olfactory disorders is crucial.
  • Commercially available odourized markers (OM) offer a potential basis for such tests.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To develop and validate a psychophysical screening test for olfactory function using odourized markers (OM).
  • To evaluate five different variations of the OM technique for optimal performance.
  • To compare the efficacy of the OM test against a standard olfactory test.

Main Methods:

  • 189 subjects, including healthy individuals and those with olfactory disorders, were tested.
  • Five distinct OM-based testing variations were assessed.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Olfactory function was evaluated using the "Sniffin' Sticks" test as a benchmark.

    • Main Results:

    • Correlation between OM screening tests and "Sniffin' Sticks" ranged from 0.49 to 0.93, highlighting technique sensitivity.
    • The optimal OM method involved spontaneous odour naming and identification from a list.
    • This optimized method demonstrated sufficient sensitivity for detecting anosmia.

    Conclusions:

    • The odourized markers screening test is suitable for widespread anosmia screening in the general population.
    • While effective for screening, the OM test has limitations in precisely quantifying olfactory function due to a limited odour set.