Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Conserving biodiversity efficiently: what to do, where, and when.

Kerrie A Wilson1, Emma C Underwood, Scott A Morrison

  • 1The Ecology Centre, School of Integrative Biology, University of Queensland, St. Lucia, Queensland, Australia. kwilson@tnc.org

Plos Biology
|August 24, 2007
PubMed
Summary

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Uncovering correlates of decline and critical refuges for a threatened terrestrial mammal.

Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology·2026
Same author

Global Patterns of Niche Changes in Alien Mammals: Potential Drivers and Significance for Invasion Projections.

Global change biology·2026
Same author

How monitoring matters for nature conservation: 15 reasons framed in a theory of change.

Proceedings. Biological sciences·2026
Same author

A place-based assessment of biodiversity intactness in sub-Saharan Africa.

Nature·2025
Same author

Multiple-use spatial planning for sustainable development and conservation.

Trends in ecology & evolution·2025
Same author

Emerging threats to Antarctic conservation.

Nature ecology & evolution·2025
Same journal

The cell cloud: Adopting systems biology concepts in the era of single-cell immunology.

PLoS biology·2026
Same journal

Disinhibitory signaling enables flexible coding of top-down information in cortical networks.

PLoS biology·2026
Same journal

Correction: Cdc42 interacts with chaperone Ydj1 to enhance its stability and partitioning during asymmetric cell division and aging in yeast.

PLoS biology·2026
Same journal

Towards globally equitable bioinformatics adoption.

PLoS biology·2026
Same journal

The human claustrum supports cognitive networks for externally and internally driven task demands.

PLoS biology·2026
Same journal

Unusual decay: Recombination loss leads to splicing errors in green algae.

PLoS biology·2026
See all related articles
This summary is machine-generated.

New conservation frameworks prioritize actions and funding to effectively protect more species. This approach addresses specific threats, improving cost-effectiveness and minimizing wasted resources for biodiversity conservation.

Area of Science:

  • Conservation Science
  • Biodiversity Management
  • Ecoregional Planning

Background:

  • Existing conservation priority-setting schemes often lack integration of geographic priorities with threat-specific action funding.
  • Current approaches may overemphasize land purchase or species richness without adequately addressing underlying threats.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To develop and apply a novel framework combining geographic priorities with threat-based funding allocation for conservation actions.
  • To improve upon existing conservation planning by incorporating threat mitigation and cost-effectiveness.

Main Methods:

  • Development of a decision-support framework for conservation priority-setting.
  • Application of the framework to 17 Mediterranean ecoregions, analyzing various conservation actions (e.g., invasive species control, land acquisition, off-reserve management).

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • The developed framework demonstrates that targeted conservation actions can protect significantly more plant and vertebrate species compared to solely focusing on land acquisition for protected areas.
  • Investment in a sequence of threat-specific actions yields higher biodiversity outcomes.

Conclusions:

  • Integrating geographic priorities with a threat-based funding allocation framework enhances conservation effectiveness.
  • This approach ensures that scarce conservation resources are invested in the most cost-effective actions for biodiversity protection.