Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 12, 2026

Low-Cost, Volume-Controlled Dipstick Urinalysis for Home-Testing
Published on: May 8, 2021
[Handilab C Chlamydia for home testing is not what it claims]
1Olafiaklinikken, Legevaktetaten Oslo kommune, Grensen 5-7, 0159 Oslo. harald.moi@ulleval.no
Background:
The Norwegian Institute of Public Health recommends increased testing for genital chlamydia infection to halt an increasing incidence. A rapid home test claiming a "safety" of 98% was marketed in Norwegian pharmacies in 2005 for use in women.
Material And Methods:
Women attending the Olafia Clinic in Oslo for a sexual health check were asked to perform a Handilab C test themselves. Samples for the nucleid acid amplification test (NAAT) were thereafter taken and sent to the microbiology laboratory. The results were compared.
Results:
In a pilot study, 80 of 88 women completed both tests. Four tests were positive according to NAAT, none of which were interpreted as positive by Handilab C. A new study including 168 women was carried out because the first 50 tests provided by the Norwegian import company were found to be out of date and a new and better instruction form was provided. Of the 157 women who completed both tests, 16 had positive NAAT results for C trachomatis; four of these were interpreted as positive by the Handilab C test and 9 as uncertain (sensitivity 25-57%). Half of the women were uncertain about how to interpret the test result and 13 who had a negative NAAT interpreted Handilab C as positive (positive predictive value 24%).
Interpretation:
Most women had no problems taking the vaginal swab test, but Handilab C did not fulfil its claim to be a "safe" rapid test. The majority were uncertain about how to interpret the result or had false negative or false positive results.
Related Concept Videos
Trichomoniasis
Bacterial Phylum Chlamydiae
Sexually Transmitted Infections
Test for Homogeneity
Automated Microbial Diagnostics
