Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 12, 2026
Metacarpal Small Incision for Carpal Tunnel Syndrome
Published on: April 5, 2024
[Reintervention after endoscopic surgery of the carpal tunnel syndrome]
S Vossen1, S Moehlen-Albrecht, K J Steffens
1Handchirurgie, St. Josefs-Krankenhaus Essen, Heidbergweg 22-24, 45257 Essen. sandravossen@gmx.de
Background:
The carpal tunnel syndrome is one of the most frequent peripheric nerve compression syndromes. Almost 15 years ago, the endoscopic surgery of the carpal tunnel was introduced, in order to reduce postoperative pain and to shorten the length of the postoperative inactivity period, especially work absence. In the literature the rate of complications due to the endoscopic carpal tunnel release surgery is reported differently in respect to number and severity. This paper summarizes all reinterventions after endoscopic surgery in a single specialized hand surgery department, which prefers the open approach even for first time interventions.
Patients And Method:
A retrospective analysis of all reoperations between 1998 and 2006 is presented. There were 22 reinterventions done on 21 patients. A reoperation was performed if the symptoms of the carpal tunnel syndrome persisted or new pain or sensomotor deficit appeared. There were 8 male and 14 female patients. The age span ranged from 28 to 86 years. The time distance between the first and the second surgery was between 19 days and 36 months.
Results:
Most of the intraoperative findings were incomplete releases of the retinaculum (n = 13). In three cases abundant adherences caused the clinical symptoms. Three times pathologies were found in carpal tunnel, which could not be recognized or treated endoscopically: severe bleeding in the synovia, massive synovialitis and a swannoma of the median nerve. In seven patients transsected nerves had to be treated: one complete transsection of the median nerve, two nerves with injured radial fascicles, two nerves with violated ulnar fascicles, one neuroma of the median nerve and one transsection of both branches of the ulnar nerve.
Conclusion:
In 22 cases the result of the endoscopic release of the carpal tunnel forced to redo the intervention. In seven patients there were important lesions of the neurovascular structures. Since the long-term result of the endoscopic and open surgery of the carpal tunnel is comparable, it should be discussed if endoscopic surgery is justified even with the risk of mutilant complications and which preoperative imaging procedure is required to discover pathologies and anatomical variants.
