Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Surrogacy: the case for a conventional approach.

L Sullivan1

  • 1Department of Psychology, University of Sydney, Australia.

Medicine and Law
|January 1, 1991
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Cognitive bias in veterinary clinical decision-making: Antemortem misdiagnosis of suspected giant kidney worm (Dioctophyme renale) in Australia.

Australian veterinary journal·2026
Same author

Clinical assessment of a point-of-care assay to determine protective vaccinal antibody titers to canine viral diseases.

Veterinary journal (London, England : 1997)·2023
Same author

Suspect severe gastroenteritis associated with ingestion of caterpillar setae fragments in a cat.

Australian veterinary journal·2023
Same author

Real-Time PCR and LAMP Assays for the Detection of Spores of <i>Alternaria solani</i> and Sporangia of <i>Phytophthora infestans</i> to Inform Disease Risk Forecasting.

Plant disease·2019
Same author

Is ultra wide-field retinal imaging alone appropriate for retinal angioma screening in lower risk subjects attending Von Hippel-Lindau (VHL) clinics?

Ophthalmic genetics·2019
Same author

Disseminated Sporotrichosis in a Bilby (Macrotis lagotis).

Journal of comparative pathology·2019
Same journal

CRIMINAL CONDUCT DUE TO DRUNKENNESS: CRITICAL EVALUATION OF BRAZILIAN TRAFFIC LEGISLATION.

Medicine and law·2019
Same journal

TRANSDISCIPLINARITY IN STRATEGIC DECISIONS FOR ONCOLOGICAL TREATMENTS.

Medicine and law·2019
Same journal

LAWS RELATED TO THE PROTECTION OF WOMEN'S HEALTH IN JAPAN.

Medicine and law·2019
Same journal

ANTICIPATED DIRECTIVES OF WILL, ADVANCE HEALTH CARE DIRECTIVE, HEALTH CARE ATTORNEY: AN ISSUE OF SELF-DETERMINATION.

Medicine and law·2019
Same journal

HEALTH LAW AND ELDERLY PERSONS.

Medicine and law·2019
Same journal

IS A 'NO FAULT' COMPENSATION SCHEME THE ANSWER TO THE PROBLEMS OF TORT IN CLINICAL NEGLIGENCE?

Medicine and law·2019
See all related articles

Initial reproductive technology laws obscured genetic and legal parentage, complicating future legislation. Surrogacy laws should mirror adoption regulations, preventing commercialization while respecting private reproductive choices.

Area of Science:

  • Reproductive Law
  • Family Law
  • Bioethics

Background:

  • Early reproductive technology legislation failed to distinguish genetic from social/legal parenthood.
  • This foundational issue complicates current legal challenges, including those related to surrogacy.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To analyze the impact of initial legislative missteps on reproductive technology law.
  • To propose a legislative framework for surrogacy based on established legal precedents.

Main Methods:

  • Review of existing legislation concerning reproductive technologies and parentage.
  • Analysis of the NSW Law Reform Commission's recommendations on surrogacy.
  • Comparative legal analysis of surrogacy and adoption frameworks.
Keywords:
Genetics and ReproductionLegal ApproachNew South Wales Law Reform Commission

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • Initial legislation's conflation of genetic and legal parenthood created ongoing legal complexities.
  • Surrogacy legislation should align with adoption laws, prohibiting commercialization.
  • This approach aims to discourage surrogacy by removing commercial incentives and guarantees for commissioning couples.

Conclusions:

  • Legislation for reproductive technologies requires clear distinctions between genetic and social/legal parentage.
  • Surrogacy should be regulated similarly to adoption, focusing on non-commercial arrangements.
  • Existing social and legal frameworks should guide the integration of new reproductive technologies.