Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 12, 2026

Multiplex PCR Assay for Typing of Staphylococcal Cassette Chromosome Mec Types I to V in Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus
Published on: September 5, 2013
Assessment of molecular typing methods to determine invasiveness and to differentiate clones of Streptococcus
Caroline A Obert1, Geli Gao, Jack Sublett
1Hartwell Center for Bioinformatics and Biotechnology, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, 332 North Lauderdale, Memphis, TN 38105, United States. caroline.obert@stjude.org
Abstract:
In the United States, Streptococcus pneumoniae is the leading cause of community-acquired pneumonia and invasive bacterial disease. As antimicrobial resistance increases, it will become critical to determine if strains circulating in a population are likely to cause invasive pneumococcal disease (IPD). This is possible by comparison of an isolate's genotype to strains known to be invasive. In this work, we compared pulse-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) and multilocus sequence typing (MLST), comparative genomic hybridization (CGH) and multi-invasive-locus sequence typing (MILST) for their ability to distinguish between known IPD causing and carrier strains using phylogenetic analyses. In addition, we assess the ability of these techniques to determine true clones from highly related strains. The resulting trees suggest that despite similar overall topologies, the clearest picture of invasiveness and genetic relatedness can be viewed when typing methods are used collectively.
Insights
Identifying invasive Streptococcus pneumoniae strains is crucial due to rising antimicrobial resistance. Combining multiple typing methods provides the clearest picture of a strain's invasiveness and genetic relatedness for disease prediction.
Area of Science:
- Microbiology
- Genetics
- Epidemiology
Background:
- Streptococcus pneumoniae is a leading cause of community-acquired pneumonia and invasive bacterial disease in the US.
- Increasing antimicrobial resistance necessitates accurate identification of invasive pneumococcal disease (IPD) causing strains.
- Genotypic comparison of isolates to known invasive strains aids in predicting IPD risk.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the efficacy of Pulse-Field Gel Electrophoresis (PFGE), Multilocus Sequence Typing (MLST), Comparative Genomic Hybridization (CGH), and Multi-invasive-locus Sequence Typing (MILST).
- To evaluate these methods' ability to distinguish between IPD-causing and carrier strains of Streptococcus pneumoniae.
- To assess the techniques' capacity for differentiating true clones from highly related strains using phylogenetic analyses.
Main Methods:
- Phylogenetic analyses were employed to interpret the typing data.
- Comparison of four distinct genotypic typing methods: PFGE, MLST, CGH, and MILST.
- Evaluation of strain relatedness and invasiveness potential.
Main Results:
- All typing methods produced phylogenetic trees with similar overall topologies.
- The collective application of typing methods provided the clearest visualization of strain invasiveness.
- Combined analysis enhanced the understanding of genetic relatedness between strains.
Conclusions:
- No single typing method is sufficient for a comprehensive assessment of Streptococcus pneumoniae invasiveness.
- Utilizing a combination of PFGE, MLST, CGH, and MILST offers superior insights into strain characteristics.
- Integrated genotypic analysis is essential for accurate prediction of invasive pneumococcal disease potential in clinical and epidemiological settings.
Related Concept Videos
Modern Molecular Taxonomy
Methods of Classification and Identification
Applications of Molecular Taxonomy
