Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Oral implants.

D van Steenberghe1

  • 1Department of Periodontology, Catholic University, Leuven, Belgium.

Current Opinion in Dentistry
|April 1, 1991
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Small changes in oral implant hardware, including sterilization methods, can affect biocompatibility and cellular adhesion. This review examines oral implant characteristics, success rates, and potential complications.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Cortical activation resulting from the stimulation of periodontal mechanoreceptors measured by functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI).

Clinical oral investigations·2014
Same author

Jaw, head and finger tracking behaviour with delayed visual feedback.

Journal of electromyography and kinesiology : official journal of the International Society of Electrophysiological Kinesiology·2010
Same author

Accuracy assessment of computer-assisted flapless implant placement in partial edentulism.

Journal of clinical periodontology·2010
Same author

Assessment of changes in the oral tactile function of the soft tissues by implant placement in the anterior maxilla: a prospective study.

Clinical oral investigations·2009
Same author

Detection of odorous compounds in breath.

Journal of dental research·2009
Same author

Radiographic detection of artificial intra-bony defects in the edentulous area.

Clinical oral implants research·2008
Same journal

Diagnosis and treatment planning in orthodontics.

Current opinion in dentistry·1992
Same journal

Bibliography of the current world literature. Pedodontics.

Current opinion in dentistry·1992
Same journal

Bibliography of the current world literature. Orthodontics.

Current opinion in dentistry·1992
Same journal

Advances in the treatment of acquired and developmental defects of hard dental tissues.

Current opinion in dentistry·1992
Same journal

The child as a dental patient.

Current opinion in dentistry·1992
Same journal

The need for long-term multicenter treatment assessment of craniofacial developmental disorders including cleft lip and palate.

Current opinion in dentistry·1992
See all related articles

Area of Science:

  • Biomaterials Science
  • Dental Implantology
  • Cellular Biology

Background:

  • Biocompatibility of oral implants is crucial for successful osseointegration.
  • Surface characteristics and sterilization methods can significantly impact implant performance.
  • Evidence suggests even minor hardware alterations may compromise implant integration.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To review the surface characteristics and configuration of various oral implants.
  • To analyze the success rates associated with different oral implant systems.
  • To discuss potential complications arising from oral implant procedures.

Main Methods:

  • Literature review of studies on oral implant surface properties.
  • Analysis of sterilization techniques and their effect on cellular adhesion.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Synthesis of data on implant configuration, success rates, and complications.
  • Main Results:

    • Surface topography and material composition influence cellular adhesion and biocompatibility.
    • Sterilization processes can alter surface energy, affecting biological responses.
    • Variations in implant design correlate with differing clinical success rates.

    Conclusions:

    • Meticulous attention to oral implant hardware, including surface treatments and sterilization, is essential.
    • Understanding implant surface characteristics is key to optimizing biocompatibility and clinical outcomes.
    • Further research is needed to fully elucidate the impact of hardware modifications on long-term implant success.