Correlation of in-vitro parameters of antimicrobial activity with prophylactic efficacy in an intradermal model of...

Cephalosporins differ in their ability to prevent staphylococcal wound infection. Although the reasons for the observed differences are not fully understood, the susceptibility of cephalosporins to hydrolysis by staphylococcal beta-lactamase has been correlated with failures of prophylaxis. To investigate the effect of beta-lactamase stability and other in-vitro parameters of the bacterial-antimicrobial interaction on the efficacy of antimicrobial prophylaxis, two beta-lactamase-stable agents, cefuroxime and cefmetazole were compared to cefazolin and cefamandole in an in-vivo model of intradermal infection employing four strains of Staphylococcus aureus. Following intraperitoneal administration of a single dose of cephalosporin or placebo, guinea pigs were inoculated at multiple intradermal sites with 2 x 10(7) cfu of a strain of staphylococcus. For three strains, the area of induration at 24 h following inoculation was significantly smaller in guinea pigs receiving prophylaxis with cephalosporins versus placebo; no cephalosporin was effective against the fourth strain. Differences were also noted among the cephalosporins; prophylaxis with cefuroxime and cefmetazole resulted in smaller lesions than seen in animals given cefazolin or cefamandole. Poor correlation was noted between results of the in-vivo model and in-vitro determinants of the bacterial-antimicrobial interaction which were MIC values, time-kill curves, and the rates of beta-lactamase-mediated cephalosporin hydrolysis by the different strains. The model demonstrated unexplained failures of prophylaxis and unexpected differences in efficacy of various cephalosporins as has been described before. This study highlights the need for an improved animal model of surgical antimicrobial prophylaxis and the identification of in-vitro determinants that predict in-vivo prophylactic efficacy more accurately.