Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Kepler's First Law of Planetary Motion01:10

Kepler's First Law of Planetary Motion

In the early 17th century, German astronomer and mathematician Johannes Kepler postulated three laws for the motion of planets in the solar system. He formulated his first two laws based on the observations of his forebears, Nikolaus Copernicus and Tycho Brahe.
Polish astronomer Nikolaus Copernicus put forth a theory that stated a heliocentric model for the solar system. According to this heliocentric theory, all the planets, including Earth, orbit the Sun in circular orbits.
On the other hand,...
Circular Orbits and Critical Velocity for Satellites01:16

Circular Orbits and Critical Velocity for Satellites

The Moon orbits around the Earth. In turn, the Earth (and other planets) orbit the Sun. The space directly above our atmosphere is filled with artificial satellites in orbit. One can examine the circular orbit, the simplest kind of orbit, to understand the relationship between the speed and the period of planets and satellites with respect to their positions and the bodies that they orbit.
Nicolaus Copernicus (1473-1543) first suggested that the Earth and all other planets orbit the Sun in...
Kepler's Second Law of Planetary Motion01:29

Kepler's Second Law of Planetary Motion

In the early 17th century, German astronomer and mathematician Johannes Kepler postulated three laws for the motion of planets in the solar system. His first law states that all planets orbit the Sun in an elliptical orbit, with the Sun at one of the ellipse's foci. Therefore, the distance of a planet from the Sun varies throughout its revolution around the Sun.
While in an elliptical orbit, the total energy of the planet is conserved. Therefore, the planet slows down when it is at apogee and...
Kepler's Third Law of Planetary Motion01:18

Kepler's Third Law of Planetary Motion

In the early 17th century, German astronomer and mathematician Johannes Kepler postulated three laws for the motion of planets in the solar system. In 1909, he formulated his first two laws based on the observations of his forebears, Nikolaus Copernicus and Tycho Brahe. However, in 1918, he published his third law of planetary motion, which gives a precise mathematical relationship between a planet's average distance from the Sun and the amount of time it takes to revolve around the Sun. It...
Dynamics of Circular Motion01:30

Dynamics of Circular Motion

An object undergoing circular motion, like a race car, is accelerating because it is changing the direction of its velocity. This centrally directed acceleration is called centripetal acceleration. This acceleration acts along the radius of the curved path (thus is also referred to as radial acceleration).
Any acceleration must be produced by some force. Therefore, any force or combination of forces can cause centripetal acceleration. A few examples include the tension in the rope on a...
Non-uniform Circular Motion01:22

Non-uniform Circular Motion

In uniform circular motion, the particle executing circular motion has a constant speed, and the circle is at a fixed radius. However, not all circular motion occurs at a constant speed. A particle can travel in a circle and speed up or slow down, showing an acceleration in the direction of motion. In that case, the motion is called non-uniform circular motion, and an additional acceleration is introduced, which is in the direction tangential to the circle. 
For example, such accelerations...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

No ice on the moon?

Science (New York, N.Y.)·1999
Same author

Voyager radio science observations of neptune and triton.

Science (New York, N.Y.)·1989
Same author

Radar glory from buried craters on icy moons.

Science (New York, N.Y.)·1986
Same author

Voyager 2 radio science observations of the uranian system: atmosphere, rings, and satellites.

Science (New York, N.Y.)·1986
Same author

An anniversary in astronomy: the early years of radio astronomy.

Science (New York, N.Y.)·1985
Same author

Probing Titan's Surface.

Science (New York, N.Y.)·1984

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jul 12, 2026

The Assembly and Application of 'Shear Rings': A Novel Endothelial Model for Orbital, Unidirectional and Periodic Fluid Flow and Shear Stress
09:20

The Assembly and Application of 'Shear Rings': A Novel Endothelial Model for Orbital, Unidirectional and Periodic Fluid Flow and Shear Stress

Published on: October 31, 2016

Entwined and parallel bundled orbits as alternative models for narrow planetary ringlets.

V R Eshleman

    Science (New York, N.Y.)
    |July 22, 1983
    PubMed
    Summary

    Two models explain Uranus ringlets: parallel (2D) and entwined (3D) orbits. The 3D model better accounts for observed particle density, with distinct observational signatures for each. Further research is needed for entwined orbits.

    Area of Science:

    • Planetary Science
    • Astrophysics
    • Orbital Dynamics

    Background:

    • Uranus ringlets are narrow and exhibit high particle densities.
    • Existing models often assume a 2D parallel packing of particle orbits.
    • This 2D assumption struggles to explain observed particle densities.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To explore two distinct models for Uranus ringlet formation: parallel and entwined orbits.
    • To evaluate the ability of each model to explain observational data, particularly particle density.
    • To identify potential observational methods to differentiate between the two models.

    Main Methods:

    • Theoretical modeling of particle orbit bundling.
    • Comparison of model predictions with observational data (inferred particle density).

    More Related Videos

    Surface Mapping of Earth-like Exoplanets using Single Point Light Curves
    06:48

    Surface Mapping of Earth-like Exoplanets using Single Point Light Curves

    Published on: May 10, 2020

    Ordering Single Cells and Single Embryos in 3D Confinement: A New Device for High Content Screening
    14:22

    Ordering Single Cells and Single Embryos in 3D Confinement: A New Device for High Content Screening

    Published on: September 18, 2016

    Related Experiment Videos

    Last Updated: Jul 12, 2026

    The Assembly and Application of 'Shear Rings': A Novel Endothelial Model for Orbital, Unidirectional and Periodic Fluid Flow and Shear Stress
    09:20

    The Assembly and Application of 'Shear Rings': A Novel Endothelial Model for Orbital, Unidirectional and Periodic Fluid Flow and Shear Stress

    Published on: October 31, 2016

    Surface Mapping of Earth-like Exoplanets using Single Point Light Curves
    06:48

    Surface Mapping of Earth-like Exoplanets using Single Point Light Curves

    Published on: May 10, 2020

    Ordering Single Cells and Single Embryos in 3D Confinement: A New Device for High Content Screening
    14:22

    Ordering Single Cells and Single Embryos in 3D Confinement: A New Device for High Content Screening

    Published on: September 18, 2016

  • Analysis of potential observational discriminators (orbital/equatorial plane intersection motion, occultation signatures).

    • Main Results:

    • The entwined orbit model offers a 3D structure with potentially higher projected areal density, better matching observations.
    • The parallel orbit model, typically 2D, faces challenges in explaining high inferred particle densities.
    • Distinct observational signatures are predicted for each model, aiding discrimination.

    Conclusions:

    • The 3D entwined orbit model presents a viable alternative for Uranus ringlet formation.
    • Further theoretical and observational work is required, especially for the entwined orbit model.
    • Observational differences in motion and occultation signatures may distinguish between parallel and entwined ringlet structures.