Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Visual detectability gradients: effect of illiteracy.

F Ostrosky-Solis1, R Efron, E W Yund

  • 1Neurophysiology-Biophysics Research Laboratory, Veterans Administration Medical Center, Martinez, California 94553.

Brain and Cognition
|September 1, 1991
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

The Effects of Repeat Testing, Malingering, and Traumatic Brain Injury on Computerized Measures of Visuospatial Memory Span.

Frontiers in human neuroscience·2016
Same author

The Effects of Repeated Testing, Simulated Malingering, and Traumatic Brain Injury on Visual Choice Reaction Time.

Frontiers in human neuroscience·2015
Same author

Biology without Consciousness-and Its Consequences.

Perspectives in biology and medicine·2015
Same author

Intermodal attention modulates visual processing in dorsal and ventral streams.

NeuroImage·2012
Same author

Efficacy of tailored computer-based neurorehabilitation for improvement of movement initiation in Parkinson's disease.

Brain research·2012
Same author

Computerized analysis of error patterns in digit span recall.

Journal of clinical and experimental neuropsychology·2011
Same journal

Gelastic dysarthria: Speech-triggered pathological laughter with evidence for a selective pontine gating mechanism.

Brain and cognition·2026
Same journal

Brain correlates of linguistic-cognitive stimulation in neurotypical and Atypical older adult populations: A systematic review.

Brain and cognition·2026
Same journal

Effects of Dieting on Neural Encoding of Preferences for Edible and Non-Edible Rewards: An ERP Study.

Brain and cognition·2026
Same journal

Structural complexity of brain regions in mild cognitive impairment and Alzheimer's disease.

Brain and cognition·2026
Same journal

Spatial navigation training enhances performance on large-scale and small-scale spatial tasks through different neural mechanisms.

Brain and cognition·2026
Same journal

Unraveling the link between brain injury and enhanced artistic skills.

Brain and cognition·2026
See all related articles

Reading experience shapes visual scanning. Literate individuals exhibit more consistent visual scan paths compared to illiterate individuals, influencing target detection across spatial locations. This suggests reading acquisition refines visual processing mechanisms.

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Neuroscience
  • Visual Perception

Background:

  • Target detectability varies with spatial location, forming a "detectability gradient."
  • This gradient is linked to central serial processing of visual information.
  • Prior research suggests reading direction may influence this gradient.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate if reading experience affects the detectability gradient.
  • To compare visual scanning mechanisms in literate and illiterate individuals.

Main Methods:

  • Experiment conducted with 60 illiterate and 60 literate subjects.
  • Non-linguistic stimuli were used to assess target pattern detection.
  • Detectability gradients were analyzed as a function of spatial location.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • Overall target detection accuracy was similar between literate and illiterate groups.
  • Significant differences were found in the detectability gradients of the two groups.
  • Literate subjects showed more consistent scan paths across individuals.

Conclusions:

  • Learning to read influences the development of visual scanning mechanisms.
  • Reading acquisition leads to more standardized visual scan paths in literate individuals.
  • This standardization impacts how visual information is processed across different spatial locations.