Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 11, 2026

Tracking Infiltration Front Depth Using Time-lapse Multi-offset Gathers Collected with Array Antenna Ground Penetrating Radar
Published on: May 1, 2018
Assessment of pressure wave reflection: getting the timing right!
Patrick Segers1, Ernst R Rietzschel, Marc L De Buyzere
1Cardiovascular Mechanics and Biofluid Dynamics, IBiTech, Ghent University, B-9000 Gent, Belgium. patrick.segers@ugent.be
Wave separation analysis (WSA) is superior to waveform analysis (WFA) for assessing arterial wave reflection. WFA’s landmarks do not accurately reflect reflected wave timing or reduce gender-based differences in augmentation index.
Area of Science:
- Cardiovascular Physiology
- Biomedical Engineering
- Hemodynamics
Background:
- Arterial wave reflection analysis is crucial for understanding cardiovascular health.
- Wave separation analysis (WSA) is the gold standard, but waveform analysis (WFA) is commonly used clinically.
- Existing WFA methods use waveform landmarks to estimate reflected wave characteristics.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the accuracy of wave separation analysis (WSA) and waveform analysis (WFA) in assessing arterial wave reflection.
- To evaluate the reliability of WFA-derived parameters like timing, augmentation index, and arterial tree length.
Main Methods:
- Non-invasive measurement of carotid pressure, aortic flow, and carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity in 2132 healthy subjects (35-56 years old).
- WSA was used to determine the timing of reflected wave return (T(f-b)), pressure wave ratio (P(b)/P(f)), and effective arterial length (L(eff)).
- WFA identified landmarks (T(sho), T(inf)) to derive augmentation index (AIx) and L(eff) (AIx(sho), L(eff,sho), AIx(inf), L(eff,inf)).
Main Results:
- WFA landmarks (T(inf), T(sho)) did not correspond to WSA-derived timing (T(f-b)).
- L(eff) decreased with age, while L(eff,inf) increased with age in women, showing discrepancies with physiological expectations.
- WFA-derived AIx showed persistent gender differences, which were significantly reduced when calculated using WSA-based timing (AIx(f-b)).
Conclusions:
- Waveform analysis (WFA) landmarks are unreliable for accurately assessing the timing and magnitude of arterial wave reflection.
- WSA provides more accurate and physiologically consistent measures of arterial wave reflection compared to WFA.
- Accurate analysis of pressure wave reflection necessitates simultaneous measurement of pressure and flow (WSA), not solely waveform analysis (WFA).
Related Concept Videos
Echo
Imagine the sound is reflected back to the ears. Assuming that the source is very close to the human, the difference between hearing the two sounds—the emitted sound and the reflected sound—may be more than the minimum time for perceiving distinct sounds. If this is the case, then the...
Reflection of Waves
Sound as Pressure Waves
The pressure fluctuation depends on the difference in displacements between the successive points in the...
Assessing Blood pressure using a doppler ultrasound
Pre-Procedural Guidelines for Doppler Ultrasound Blood Pressure Assessment:
Preparation of Equipment:
Momentum And Radiation Pressure
Shock Waves
When the source's speed approaches the speed of sound, constructive interference between successive wavefronts emitted by the source occurs immediately behind it. Initially, scientists believed that this constructive interference would result in such high pressures...

