Cross-Database Generalization of a Single-Feature Threshold Model for Congestive Heart Failure Detection from Short-Term Heart Rate Variability
Related Experiment Videos
Yongjun Song1, Bangyu Wu1, Yingying Song2
1School of Computer Science and Engineering, Guangzhou Institute of Science and Technology, No. 138, Xing Tai San Road, Taihe Town, Baiyun District, Guangzhou, Guangdong, 510540, China.
Abstract:
Objective To evaluate the transferability of interpretable single-feature threshold models across the five evaluated databases for congestive heart failure (CHF) detection from short-term heart rate variability (HRV), and to compare their performance with optimized multi-feature classifiers. Approach Twenty HRV features from 60-second inter-beat interval windows in five databases were evaluated using leave-one-database-pair-out nested cross-validation with six outer-test sets and their corresponding outer-development sets. Within each outer-development set, directions and thresholds were fitted on inner-train sets, and features were selected according to mean inner-validation F1 score. The selected model was refitted on the complete outer-development set. The most frequently selected feature was further evaluated across the six outer-test sets with separately fitted directions and thresholds. Eight multi-feature classifiers were optimized and evaluated using the same data splits. Performance was assessed using record-balanced window-level metrics and database-stratified recording-level bootstrap confidence intervals. Main results The short-term detrended fluctuation analysis scaling exponent (f14) was selected most frequently. The f14 threshold model achieved the highest mean test AUC (0.881 ± 0.038), F1 score (0.718 ± 0.079), and sensitivity among the evaluated single-feature and multi-feature models. Among the eight multi-feature classifiers, Random Forest achieved the highest mean test AUC (0.858 ± 0.067). Significance An interpretable single-feature threshold model showed strong CHF-Normal Sinus Rhythm (NSR) discrimination in the five evaluated databases. f14 was the strongest candidate in this evaluation, although its thresholds varied across outer-development sets and its clinical specificity requires further validation.