Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Embryonic potential and stem cells.

Nicholas Agar1

  • 1Victoria University of Wellington, Philosophy Program, PO Box 600, Wellington, New Zealand. Nicholas.Agar@vuw.ac.nz

Bioethics
|September 12, 2007
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

How Going to Space Changes the Debate About Radical Human Enhancement.

Bioethics·2025
Same author

Approach to allergic rhinitis in the primary care setting.

Australian journal of general practice·2024
Same author

Can 'eugenics' be defended?

Monash bioethics review·2021
Same author

We should eliminate the concept of disease from mental health.

Journal of medical ethics·2019
Same author

Extranodal NK/T cell lymphoma, nasal type, with retrobulbar extraconal phlegmon and naso-oral fistula.

BMJ case reports·2019
Same author

Why We Should Defend Gene Editing as Eugenics.

Cambridge quarterly of healthcare ethics : CQ : the international journal of healthcare ethics committees·2018
Same journal

Transhumanism Without Transindividuation in the Age Without Epochality: Stiegler, Vice, and Radical Human Enhancement.

Bioethics·2026
Same journal

Between Safeguard and Constraint: Navigating Patient Autonomy in Protective Laws for Medical Assistance in Dying.

Bioethics·2026
Same journal

Bioethics of Space Exploration: Life, Risk, and Responsibility Beyond Earth.

Bioethics·2026
Same journal

The Concept of Harm in Medical Ethics.

Bioethics·2026
Same journal

On the Destruction and Humanitarianisation of the Health System in Gaza and the Need for a Biopolitical Bioethics.

Bioethics·2026
Same journal

Shaping Future Children, Sex Selection, and "Normal" Human Capacities.

Bioethics·2026
See all related articles

Embryos suitable for embryonic stem cell research (ESCR) are identified by their lack of a functional womb relationship, not by disposal status or specific creation methods. This research explores the moral permissibility of ESCR.

Area of Science:

  • Bioethics
  • Developmental Biology
  • Stem Cell Research

Background:

  • The moral status of embryos is a central debate in embryonic stem cell research (ESCR).
  • Potentiality is a key concept used to argue for or against the moral permissibility of embryo use in research.
  • Existing arguments often focus on embryo disposal status or creation method (e.g., IVF, SCNT).

Purpose of the Study:

  • To examine and critique existing arguments for embryo suitability in ESCR based on potentiality.
  • To propose an alternative criterion for determining moral suitability of embryos for ESCR.
  • To advance ethical considerations in stem cell research involving human embryos.

Main Methods:

  • Philosophical analysis of ethical arguments concerning embryo potentiality.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Critique of arguments by Ronald Green and Paul McHugh.
  • Development of a novel ethical framework for embryo selection in ESCR.

    • Main Results:

    • Rejection of the argument that embryos scheduled for disposal are morally suitable for ESCR.
    • Rejection of the argument that SCNT-created embryos possess unique potentiality for therapeutic stem cell use.
    • Proposal that the absence of a functional womb relationship is the defining characteristic for moral suitability in ESCR.

    Conclusions:

    • The moral suitability of embryos for ESCR should be determined by their lack of a functional relationship with a womb.
    • This criterion offers a more consistent ethical basis for ESCR than arguments based on disposal or specific creation methods.
    • Ethical guidelines for ESCR can be refined by focusing on the developmental context of the embryo.