Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Ethical Dilemmas II01:30

Ethical Dilemmas II

Resolving an ethical dilemma in healthcare involves a systematic approach that considers every aspect of the issue, respecting both the patient's needs and values and the healthcare professional's ethical obligations. Here are potential steps to resolve an ethical dilemma:
Standards of Care II01:19

Standards of Care II

Nurses bear specific legal responsibilities under several federal statutes, including:
Ethical Issues01:27

Ethical Issues

Nurses are essential in patient care, upholding the ethical principles of their profession and effectively navigating ethical dilemmas. Neglecting ethical issues can lead to inadequate patient care, compromised therapeutic relationships, and moral distress among healthcare workers.
Ethical Concerns in Healthcare:
Nursing Ethical Principles II01:27

Nursing Ethical Principles II

Ethical principles are essential in guiding nurses to fulfill their responsibilities, focusing on the quality of nursing care and decision-making. These principles, including autonomy, beneficence, non-maleficence, justice, and fidelity, shape the ethical framework within healthcare settings.
Consider the following scenario, which illustrates how these principles are applied in the care of Mr. John, a fifty-year-old teacher diagnosed with metastatic liver cancer.
Initially, Mr. John's cancer...
Ethical Dilemmas I01:17

Ethical Dilemmas I

Ethical dilemmas in nursing are of utmost importance, as they often arise from the tension between adhering to core ethical principles and the practical realities of healthcare delivery. These dilemmas require nurses to navigate complex situations where competing ethical considerations pull them in different directions.
Let us explore some examples to understand the potentially complex moral decisions nurses face.
Take the case of caring for minors, particularly in areas related to reproductive...
Decision Making01:20

Decision Making

Decision-making is a fundamental cognitive process that involves evaluating alternatives and selecting among them. This process can range from simple choices, such as deciding what to wear, to complex decisions, like choosing a major in college or a career path. The complexity of the decision often dictates the approach we use, which can be broadly categorized into two types: automatic and controlled decision-making.
Automatic decision-making is fast, intuitive, and relies on gut feelings...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Replacing Surrogate Decision-Making with Supported Decision-Making for Minimal Risk Research.

The Journal of law, medicine & ethics : a journal of the American Society of Law, Medicine & Ethics·2026
Same author

Intellectual Disability and Supported Decision-Making in Clinical Research: Anticipating Ethical Challenges.

The Journal of law, medicine & ethics : a journal of the American Society of Law, Medicine & Ethics·2026
Same author

Using Supported Decision-Making to Promote Value-Aligned Research Participation.

The Journal of law, medicine & ethics : a journal of the American Society of Law, Medicine & Ethics·2026
Same author

Supported Decision-Making and the Inclusion of People who Lack Decisional Capacity in Greater than Minimal Risk Research.

The Journal of law, medicine & ethics : a journal of the American Society of Law, Medicine & Ethics·2026
Same author

The next phase in Long COVID research: addressing the ethical challenges in trials of disease-modifying treatments.

EClinicalMedicine·2026
Same author

Surrogate Decision-Making in Carceral Healthcare.

Journal of general internal medicine·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jul 11, 2026

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting (Propensity Score) using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index
06:55

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting (Propensity Score) using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index

Published on: January 8, 2020

Medical decision making for patients without surrogates.

Sumeeta Varma1, David Wendler

  • 1Department of Bioethics, NIH Clinical Center, 10 Center Dr, Building 10, Room 1C118, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA.

Archives of Internal Medicine
|September 12, 2007
PubMed
Summary

A new computer tool, the population-based treatment indicator, may predict patient treatment preferences as accurately as surrogates. This tool could ensure patient wishes are respected even without available surrogates.

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jul 11, 2026

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting (Propensity Score) using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index
06:55

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting (Propensity Score) using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index

Published on: January 8, 2020

Area of Science:

  • Medical Ethics
  • Health Informatics
  • Clinical Decision Support

Background:

  • Physicians face challenges in making treatment decisions for incapacitated patients lacking advance directives or next of kin.
  • Current decision-making mechanisms often lack patient-specific knowledge, potentially leading to preferences being disregarded.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To introduce and evaluate the potential of a population-based treatment indicator for predicting patient treatment preferences.
  • To explore a novel method for respecting the treatment preferences of incapacitated patients without available surrogates.

Main Methods:

  • A population-based treatment indicator, a computer-based tool, was analyzed.
  • The tool predicts patient preferences based on data from similar patients in similar situations.

Main Results:

  • Analysis suggests the population-based treatment indicator can predict patient preferences with accuracy comparable to patient-appointed surrogates and next of kin.
  • This indicates a potential mechanism to uphold treatment preferences for patients lacking surrogates.

Conclusions:

  • Population-based treatment indicators offer a promising approach to ensure treatment preferences are respected for all patients, including those without surrogates.
  • Further data collection on patient preferences and exploration of implementation strategies are recommended.