Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 11, 2026

07:00
Electrically Evoked Stapedius Reflex Measurements in Cochlear Implantation and Its Application in the Postoperative Fitting Process
Published on: June 21, 2024
Short-term and long-term hearing aid benefit and user satisfaction: a comparison between two fitting protocols
Lu-Feng Shi1, Karen A Doherty, Tammy M Kordas
1Gebbie Hearing Clinic, Department of Communication Sciences and Disorders, Syracuse University, Syracuse, New York, USA. lu.shi@liu.edu
Journal of the American Academy of Audiology
|September 14, 2007
Summary
This study compared two hearing aid fitting protocols. Protocol B, including speech-in-noise testing, resulted in fewer adjustments and sustained user satisfaction compared to Protocol A.
Area of Science:
- Audiology
- Hearing Science
- Speech-Language Pathology
Background:
- Current hearing aid fitting protocols often include speech-in-noise testing and loudness measures.
- The impact of these specific measures on hearing aid benefit and user satisfaction remains unclear.
- Optimizing hearing aid fitting protocols is crucial for improving audiological outcomes.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the effects of two hearing aid fitting protocols on hearing aid benefit and user satisfaction.
- To evaluate the influence of incorporating speech-in-noise testing and advanced loudness measures into a standard fitting protocol.
Main Methods:
- Two hearing aid fitting protocols were compared: Protocol A (electroacoustic analysis, real-ear measures, user feedback) and Protocol B (Protocol A plus speech-in-noise testing, loudness discomfort levels, aided loudness).
- Thirty-two participants were fitted and assessed using the Abbreviated Profile of Hearing Aid Benefit (APHAB) and Satisfaction with Amplification in Daily Life (SADL) at 45 days and three months.
- Hearing aid adjustments and audiological outcomes were recorded for both groups.
Main Results:
- Fewer hearing aid adjustments were required for participants fitted with Protocol B compared to Protocol A.
- Despite similar final amplification gains between groups, Satisfaction with Amplification in Daily Life (SADL) scores declined over time for Protocol A participants.
- Abbreviated Profile of Hearing Aid Benefit (APHAB) scores remained comparable across both protocols.
Conclusions:
- Incorporating speech-in-noise testing and comprehensive loudness measures into hearing aid fitting protocols may lead to greater long-term user satisfaction.
- Protocol B, which included advanced audiological assessments, demonstrated a potential advantage in maintaining user satisfaction over time.
- Further research is warranted to fully elucidate the benefits of specific audiological measures in hearing aid fitting protocols.