Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Learning strategies in amnesia.

Maarten Speekenbrink1, Shelley Channon, David R Shanks

  • 1Department of Psychology, University College London, Gower Street, London WC1E 6BT, UK. m.speekenbrink@ucl.ac.uk <m.speekenbrink@ucl.ac.uk>

Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews
|September 15, 2007
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Does Overconfidence Really Confer Adaptive Benefits to Children's Learning?

Psychological science·2026
Same author

Nothing to see here: The weak evidence base for unconscious control of human behavior.

The Behavioral and brain sciences·2026
Same author

Investigating the analytical robustness of the social and behavioural sciences.

Nature·2026
Same author

Anchoring the anchor: judgments of both items assimilate in item-based anchoring.

Cognitive psychology·2026
Same author

Replicating the unconscious working memory effect: a multisite Registered Report.

Neuroscience of consciousness·2026
Same author

Good Learners Are Poor Monitors: A Negative Relation Between Learning Ability and Monitoring Accuracy.

Psychological science·2025
Same journal

Dissecting first-episode psychosis heterogeneity with clustering analyses: a systematic review.

Neuroscience and biobehavioral reviews·2026
Same journal

Irisin and anxiety-like behaviors: Mechanistic integration of peripheral-central crosstalk, neuroinflammation and neural plasticity.

Neuroscience and biobehavioral reviews·2026
Same journal

Efficacy of Non-Invasive Brain Stimulation in Alzheimer's Disease: An Umbrella Review of Meta-Analyses.

Neuroscience and biobehavioral reviews·2026
Same journal

Rhythms of interaction - the timescales of social coordination and why they matter.

Neuroscience and biobehavioral reviews·2026
Same journal

Neural Bases of Memory Development: Insights from Magnetic Resonance Imaging.

Neuroscience and biobehavioral reviews·2026
Same journal

Regional heterogeneity of brain insulin resistance: From molecular pathways to neural circuits.

Neuroscience and biobehavioral reviews·2026
See all related articles

Amnesic individuals show intact learning and explicit knowledge in probabilistic category tasks, challenging the idea of separate memory systems. Differences in later performance may stem from varying learning rates, not distinct implicit and explicit memory functions.

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Neuroscience
  • Memory Research

Background:

  • Previous studies suggested amnesic individuals' early performance in probabilistic category learning is unimpaired.
  • This was interpreted as evidence for separate implicit and explicit memory systems.
  • Impaired declarative knowledge in amnesics further supported the multiple-systems hypothesis.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To conduct a more fine-grained analysis of learning processes in amnesic individuals compared to controls.
  • To investigate the consistency of explicit knowledge of task structure in amnesic and control groups.
  • To test predictions derived from the multiple-systems account of memory.

Main Methods:

  • Employed a dynamic lens model approach.
  • Utilized plausible computational learning models for detailed analysis.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Compared learning processes and explicit knowledge between amnesic and control participants.

    • Main Results:

    • The learning process was found to be indistinguishable between amnesic and control groups.
    • Both amnesic and control groups demonstrated good explicit knowledge of the task structure.
    • This finding contradicts a key prediction of the multiple-systems account.

    Conclusions:

    • Results support a single-system account of memory over a multiple-systems account.
    • Previously observed differences in later categorization performance can be explained by variations in learning rate.
    • The study refines our understanding of memory function in amnesia and probabilistic learning.