Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 11, 2026

Preliminary Study on Acupuncture Combined with Grain-sized Moxibustion for Treating Rheumatoid Arthritis with Finger Joint Pain
Published on: May 16, 2025
Established rheumatoid arthritis: clinical assessments
Piet L C M van Riel1, J Fransen
1Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre, Department of Rheumatology, PO Box 9101, 6500HB Nijmegen, The Netherlands. p.vanriel@reuma.umcn.nl
Regularly assessing rheumatoid arthritis (RA) disease activity, disability, and joint damage is crucial for evaluating prognosis and treatment effectiveness. Utilizing both process and outcome measures ensures comprehensive monitoring for individuals and clinical trials.
Area of Science:
- Rheumatology
- Clinical Assessment
- Disease Monitoring
Background:
- Clinical assessment in established rheumatoid arthritis (RA) serves multiple purposes, including prognosis evaluation, disease course tracking, and intervention assessment.
- Prognostic factors are valuable for risk-benefit analysis of early pharmacotherapy but have limited utility in established RA patient management.
- Individual RA disease activity, disability, and joint damage exhibit variable courses, necessitating regular monitoring.
Purpose of the Study:
- To outline the diverse applications of clinical assessment in established rheumatoid arthritis (RA).
- To highlight the importance of regular monitoring of disease activity, disability, and joint damage.
- To discuss the utility of process and outcome measures in evaluating RA interventions and clinical practice.
Main Methods:
- Review of established methods for clinical assessment in rheumatoid arthritis (RA).
- Discussion of process measures (e.g., erythrocyte sedimentation rate, joint counts) and outcome measures (e.g., radiological progression).
- Examination of 'core sets' of measures for evaluating interventions and clinical practice.
Main Results:
- Clinical assessment is vital for evaluating prognosis, disease course, and interventions in RA at individual and group levels.
- Regular evaluation using both process and outcome measures is essential for managing established RA due to variable disease courses.
- Standardized 'core sets' of measures are effective for evaluating RA interventions and can inform clinical practice.
Conclusions:
- Comprehensive and regular clinical assessment, employing both process and outcome measures, is fundamental for effective rheumatoid arthritis (RA) management.
- The choice of assessment instruments should align with the specific purpose, whether for prognosis, disease course monitoring, or intervention evaluation.
- Standardized assessment tools can enhance the evaluation of RA treatments and contribute to improved clinical practice.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Rheumatic Heart Disease II: Clinical Manifestations and Diagnostic Studies
Rheumatic Heart Disease IV: Nursing Management
Atherosclerosis II: Clinical Manifestations and Diagnostic Tests
Rheumatic Heart Disease I: Introduction
Peripheral Arterial Disease II: Clinical Manifestations and Diagnostic Evaluation
Rheumatic Heart Disease III: Medical Management
