Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 11, 2026

Expedited Radiation Biodosimetry by Automated Dicentric Chromosome Identification (ADCI) and Dose Estimation
Published on: September 4, 2017
The admissibility of expert evidence in Canada
Graham D Glancy1, John M W Bradford
1Department of Psychiatry, University of Toronto, Ontario, Canada. graham.glancy@utoronto.ca
Abstract:
Recent decisions in Canadian Law suggest that it is evolving in a manner heavily influenced by American law. A recent Supreme Court decision uses the framework of prevailing law and superimposes the more stringent criteria enunciated in Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc. We trace this development, reviewing the intervening cases that have contributed, and conclude with a summary of the law as it stands today.
Related Concept Videos
Eyewitness Memory
One such error is memory distortion, which occurs because human memory does not function like a...
The Evidence for Evolution
Accuracy and Errors in Hypothesis Testing
In hypothesis testing, the probability of making a Type I error, denoted as α, is commonly set at 0.05. This significance level indicates a 5% chance...
Experimental Designs
Probability Laws
Criteria for Causality: Bradford Hill Criteria - II

