Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Self-Presentation: Self-Monitoring and Self-Handicapping02:05

Self-Presentation: Self-Monitoring and Self-Handicapping

39.1K
People can go to great lengths to protect their self-image and present themselves in ways that they want others to see them. Sociologist Erving Goffman presented the idea that a person is like an actor on a stage. Calling his theory dramaturgy, Goffman believed that we use “impression management” to present ourselves to others as we hope to be perceived. Each situation is a new scene, and individuals perform different roles depending on who is present (Goffman, 1959). Think about...
39.1K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same authorSame journal

In Reply.

The journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law·2026
Same author

Dyslipidaemia and cardiovascular risk - Key considerations in South Asians.

Clinical medicine (London, England)·2026
Same author

Tumor Cell Clustering Enhances Metastatic Competence by Regulating the H3K36 Histone Demethylase KDM2A.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2026
Same author

Minimally Invasive Interventional Management of Pudendal Neuralgia: A Narrative Review.

Current pain and headache reports·2026
Same author

A Framework for Developing Mental Health Educational Interventions for Correctional Officers.

The journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law·2025
Same author

Delivering on the 10 year health plan for England.

BMJ (Clinical research ed.)·2025

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jul 20, 2025

The Motivation for Alcohol Reward: Predictors of Progressive-Ratio Intravenous Alcohol Self-Administration in Humans
05:40

The Motivation for Alcohol Reward: Predictors of Progressive-Ratio Intravenous Alcohol Self-Administration in Humans

Published on: April 28, 2022

3.1K

An International Comparison and Review of Self-Induced Intoxication Causing Automatism.

Graham D Glancy1, Kiran Patel1, Marissa Heintzman1

  • 1Dr. Glancy is Founder, Forensic Psychiatry (Canada), and Forensic Division Director, Professor, Department of Psychiatry, University of Toronto, Ontario, Canada. Dr. Patel is an Assistant Professor, Department of Psychiatry, University of Toronto, Ontario, Canada, and Staff Psychiatrist, Forensic Division, Complex Care and Recovery Program, Centre for Mental Health and Addiction, Toronto, Ontario, Canada. M. Heintzman is a Research Assistant, University of Toronto, Ontario, Canada. Dr. Schneider is Justice of the Ontario Court of Justice and Chair of the Ontario Review Board, Ontario, Canada, and Adjunct Professor, Department of Psychiatry, Faculty of Medicine and Faculty of Law, University of Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

The Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law
|August 2, 2023
PubMed
Summary

Self-induced intoxication leading to automatism presents complex legal challenges, particularly concerning vulnerable victims of violence. Legal systems in Canada, the US, and UK show inconsistencies in addressing this issue.

Keywords:
automatismcriminal responsibilitydefense lawdiminished capacityintoxicationsettled insanity

More Related Videos

Chronic Intermittent Ethanol Vapor Exposure Paired with Two-Bottle Choice to Model Alcohol Use Disorder
05:12

Chronic Intermittent Ethanol Vapor Exposure Paired with Two-Bottle Choice to Model Alcohol Use Disorder

Published on: June 23, 2023

949
A General Method for Evaluating Deep Brain Stimulation Effects on Intravenous Methamphetamine Self-Administration
09:16

A General Method for Evaluating Deep Brain Stimulation Effects on Intravenous Methamphetamine Self-Administration

Published on: January 22, 2016

15.3K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jul 20, 2025

The Motivation for Alcohol Reward: Predictors of Progressive-Ratio Intravenous Alcohol Self-Administration in Humans
05:40

The Motivation for Alcohol Reward: Predictors of Progressive-Ratio Intravenous Alcohol Self-Administration in Humans

Published on: April 28, 2022

3.1K
Chronic Intermittent Ethanol Vapor Exposure Paired with Two-Bottle Choice to Model Alcohol Use Disorder
05:12

Chronic Intermittent Ethanol Vapor Exposure Paired with Two-Bottle Choice to Model Alcohol Use Disorder

Published on: June 23, 2023

949
A General Method for Evaluating Deep Brain Stimulation Effects on Intravenous Methamphetamine Self-Administration
09:16

A General Method for Evaluating Deep Brain Stimulation Effects on Intravenous Methamphetamine Self-Administration

Published on: January 22, 2016

15.3K

Area of Science:

  • Forensic Psychiatry
  • Legal Studies
  • Social Policy

Background:

  • Self-induced intoxication and automatism intersect complex legal and psychiatric considerations.
  • Societal sensitivity is heightened due to the prevalence of substance-facilitated sexual and domestic violence, often involving women and children as victims.
  • Existing legal frameworks in Canada, the US, and the UK grapple with excusing, mitigating, or absolving perpetrators in such cases, leading to inconsistencies.

Approach:

  • This article conducts a comparative analysis of case law and legislation across Canada, the United States, and the United Kingdom.
  • It examines the legal concept of automatism, specifically when induced by self-intoxication.
  • The study illustrates how judicial bodies have adjudicated cases involving self-induced intoxication and automatism.

Key Points:

  • Legal systems exhibit variability in handling self-induced intoxication-related automatism.
  • The intersection of substance use, violence, and legal defenses raises significant societal and ethical questions.
  • Judicial interpretations and legislative responses often diverge, creating legal complexities.

Conclusions:

  • Comparative legal analysis reveals inconsistent approaches to self-induced intoxication and automatism across jurisdictions.
  • The legal treatment of automatism resulting from intoxication requires careful consideration of psychiatric evidence and social policy implications.
  • Further harmonization or clarification of legal standards may be necessary to address these complex cases effectively.