Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 11, 2026

Social Threat-Safety Test Uncovers Psychosocial Stress-Related Phenotypes
Published on: December 15, 2023
The acceptability and the tolerability of societal risks: a capabilities-based approach
Colleen Murphy1, Paolo Gardoni
1Department of Philosophy, Texas A&M University, 314 Bolton Hall, College Station, TX, 77843-4237, USA. cmmurphy@philosophy.tamu.edu
This study introduces a Capabilities-based Approach to assess risk acceptability and tolerability from hazards. It evaluates societal impact based on individual capabilities, proposing two thresholds for acceptable and tolerable risk levels.
Area of Science:
- Risk Analysis
- Societal Impact Assessment
- Human Capabilities
Background:
- Current risk assessment methods have limitations.
- Societal impact of hazards needs a more robust evaluation framework.
- Individual well-being is central to risk perception.
Purpose of the Study:
- To present a Capabilities-based Approach for evaluating risk acceptability and tolerability.
- To define risk assessment based on societal impact and individual capabilities.
- To offer a transparent and communicable framework for risk analysis.
Main Methods:
- Defining risk acceptability based on the probability of capabilities falling below an acceptable threshold.
- Defining risk tolerability based on temporary and reversible dips below the acceptable threshold, with a strict minimum tolerable threshold.
- Evaluating societal impact through changes in individuals' capabilities (functionings and beings).
Main Results:
- A novel framework for risk acceptability and tolerability is proposed.
- The approach focuses on the impact of risks on individual well-being.
- The Capabilities-based Approach offers transparency and communicability in risk assessment.
Conclusions:
- The Capabilities-based Approach provides a superior alternative to existing risk assessment methodologies.
- It directly addresses the core concern of how risks affect societal well-being.
- This framework enhances the clarity and practicality of determining acceptable and tolerable risk levels.
Related Concept Videos
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast, controlled...
Mutagenicity and Carcinogenicity
Magical Thinking
Need for Self-Esteem
Lazarus's Cognitive Appraisal Theory
Primary Appraisal:...
Social Foundations of Self II: The Generalized Other
