Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

How leaders really emerge.

Stephen J Guastello1

  • 1Department of Psychology, Marquette University, Milwaukee, WI 53201-1881, USA. stephen.guastello@marquette.edu

The American Psychologist
|September 19, 2007
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Nonlinear Science Leaps Forward … Again.

Nonlinear dynamics, psychology, and life sciences·2025
Same author

Catastrophe Modelling for Time Series of Reported Cases of COVID-19: Workload Effects in the Health Care System.

Nonlinear dynamics, psychology, and life sciences·2025
Same author

Understanding the Role of Autonomic Synchrony in the Swallowtail Catastrophe Model of Leadership Emergence.

Nonlinear dynamics, psychology, and life sciences·2025
Same author

Cusp Catastrophe Models and the Role of Synchrony in Cognitive Workload and Fatigue in Teams.

Nonlinear dynamics, psychology, and life sciences·2025
Same author

Introduction to Emergence in Social Systems.

Nonlinear dynamics, psychology, and life sciences·2025
Same author

Simultaneous Emergent Phenomena: Leadership and Team Synchrony.

Nonlinear dynamics, psychology, and life sciences·2025
Same journal

Cumulative adverse childhood experiences and parent-reported allergic conditions and asthma among U.S. children: A nationally representative study.

The American psychologist·2026
Same journal

Natural disaster, social cohesion, and prosociality: A natural experiment.

The American psychologist·2026
Same journal

Practice guidelines regarding psychologists' involvement in pharmacological issues.

The American psychologist·2026
Same journal

International Competences for Undergraduate Psychology (ICUP): A constructive shift for psychology?

The American psychologist·2026
Same journal

Two dimensions of access: Availability and affordability of mental health care across the United States.

The American psychologist·2026
Same journal

Revisiting secondary antisemitism: Antisemitism as a cause, not a consequence, of ingroup-serving Holocaust distortions.

The American psychologist·2026
See all related articles

This commentary advances leadership research by exploring how leaders' personal attributes interact with situational factors to influence outcomes. It builds upon prior research questions to offer new insights into leadership dynamics.

Area of Science:

  • Organizational Behavior
  • Leadership Studies
  • Social Psychology

Background:

  • Addresses key research questions posed by Hackman and Wageman for advancing leadership studies.
  • Focuses on the interaction between leader attributes and situational properties, moving beyond trait-based approaches.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To summarize recent progress on understanding how leader personal attributes and situational properties interact to shape leadership outcomes.
  • To contribute to the ongoing dialogue on the complexities of leadership effectiveness.

Main Methods:

  • Literature review and synthesis of recent empirical findings.
  • Conceptual analysis of leadership interactions.

Main Results:

Related Experiment Videos

  • Recent research demonstrates significant interplay between leader characteristics and contextual factors.
  • Evidence suggests that outcomes are contingent on the dynamic interaction rather than isolated attributes.

    • Conclusions:

    • The interactionist perspective is crucial for a comprehensive understanding of leadership.
    • Future leadership research should prioritize studying these dynamic interactions to yield more robust findings.