Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Related Concept Videos

Computed Tomography

Computed Tomography

Tomography refers to imaging by sections. Computed tomography (CT) is a non-invasive imaging technique that uses computers to analyze several cross-sectional X-rays to reveal minute details about structures in the body.
The technique was invented in the 1970s and is based on the principle that as X-rays pass through the body, they are absorbed or reflected at different levels. In the technique, a patient lies on a motorized platform while a computerized axial tomography (CAT) scanner rotates...

Calibration Curves: Linear Least Squares

Calibration Curves: Linear Least Squares

A calibration curve is a plot of the instrument's response against a series of known concentrations of a substance. This curve is used to set the instrument response levels, using the substance and its concentrations as standards. Alternatively, or additionally, an equation is fitted to the calibration curve plot and subsequently used to calculate the unknown concentrations of other samples reliably.
For data that follow a straight line, the standard method for fitting is the linear...

Imaging Studies III: Computed Tomography

Imaging Studies III: Computed Tomography

DefinitionComputed Tomography (CT) of the genitourinary (GU) tract is a non-invasive imaging modality that utilizes X-rays and computer processing to generate detailed cross-sectional images of the urinary system, encompassing the kidneys, ureters, bladder, and adjacent structures such as the adrenal glands.PurposeCT scans of the GU tract serve several diagnostic and therapeutic purposes, including:Diagnosis of Urinary Tract Diseases: Detects kidney stones, tumors, cysts, and congenital...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

A hybrid fault diagnosis methodology with support vector machine and improved particle swarm optimization for nuclear power plants.

ISA transactions·2019

Same author

Faulty measurement substitution and control reconfiguration by using a multivariate flow control loop.

ISA transactions·2014

Same author

QA for helical tomotherapy: report of the AAPM Task Group 148.

Medical physics·2010

Same author

IMRT commissioning: multiple institution planning and dosimetry comparisons, a report from AAPM Task Group 119.

Medical physics·2009

Same author

Helical tomotherapy superficial dose measurements.

Medical physics·2007

Same author

Image-guided helical tomotherapy for localized prostate cancer: technique and initial clinical observations.

Journal of applied clinical medical physics·2007

Search research articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jul 11, 2026

Predicting Treatment Response to Image-Guided Therapies Using Machine Learning: An Example for Trans-Arterial Treatment of Hepatocellular Carcinoma

Predicting Treatment Response to Image-Guided Therapies Using Machine Learning: An Example for Trans-Arterial Treatment of Hepatocellular Carcinoma

Published on: October 10, 2018

Verification of helical tomotherapy delivery using autoassociative kernel regression.

Rebecca M Seibert¹, Chester R Ramsey, Dustin R Garvey

¹Department of Nuclear Engineering, The University of Tennessee, Knoxville, Tennessee 37996, USA. rseiber1@utk.edu

Medical Physics

|September 21, 2007

Summary

This study introduces an autoassociative kernel regression (AAKR) model for automated quality assurance in helical tomotherapy. The AAKR model effectively detects delivery errors using exit detector data, enhancing treatment safety.

More Related Videos

Dynamic Lung Tumor Tracking for Stereotactic Ablative Body Radiation Therapy

Dynamic Lung Tumor Tracking for Stereotactic Ablative Body Radiation Therapy

Published on: June 7, 2015

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jul 11, 2026

Predicting Treatment Response to Image-Guided Therapies Using Machine Learning: An Example for Trans-Arterial Treatment of Hepatocellular Carcinoma

Predicting Treatment Response to Image-Guided Therapies Using Machine Learning: An Example for Trans-Arterial Treatment of Hepatocellular Carcinoma

Published on: October 10, 2018

Dynamic Lung Tumor Tracking for Stereotactic Ablative Body Radiation Therapy

Dynamic Lung Tumor Tracking for Stereotactic Ablative Body Radiation Therapy

Published on: June 7, 2015

Area of Science:

Medical Physics
Radiation Oncology
Machine Learning in Healthcare

Background:

Quality assurance (QA) is critical in intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT).
Current IMRT QA involves individual patient testing to verify dose delivery.
Automated, real-time QA methods are needed for advanced radiotherapy techniques.

Purpose of the Study:

To develop and evaluate a novel technique for automatic quality assurance of helical tomotherapy treatments.
To utilize exit detector data for real-time error detection during treatment delivery.
To assess the efficacy of an autoassociative kernel regression (AAKR) model for this purpose.

Main Methods:

Developed an autoassociative kernel regression (AAKR) model, a nonparametric method for predicting correct sensor values from corrupted data.
Applied the AAKR model to analyze exit detector data from helical tomotherapy delivery sequences.
Simulated delivery errors by randomly reducing the opening time of individual multileaf collimator (MLC) leaves.

Main Results:

The AAKR model demonstrated robustness in predicting error-free sensor values, even with simulated MLC errors (opening time < 10 msec).
The model successfully identified machine output errors.
Average uncertainty for unfaulted projections was low (0.4%–1.8%), indicating high prediction accuracy and potential to detect fluence changes < 2%.

Conclusions:

The AAKR model shows promise for automated, real-time QA in helical tomotherapy using exit detector data.
The technique is accurate and capable of detecting subtle delivery errors and machine output variations.
Further research is required to determine the minimum detectable error threshold and explore application to electronic portal imaging data.