Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Attentional blinks as errors in temporal binding.

Ariella V Popple1, Dennis M Levi

  • 1School of Optometry & Helen Wills Neuroscience Institute, University of California Berkeley, Berkeley, CA 94720-2020, USA. ariellap@berkeley.edu

Vision Research
|September 25, 2007
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Reduced visual acuity disrupts fixational stability but fails to fully capture amblyopic eye movements.

Optometry and vision science : official publication of the American Academy of Optometry·2026
Same author

Recovery of depth perception in adults with abnormal binocular vision.

Vision research·2026
Same author

The best stereoacuity is rarely at the fovea.

Vision research·2025
Same author

Emerging therapies for improving stereoacuity in amblyopia. A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Vision research·2025
Same author

Vergence anomalies are associated with impaired stereopsis in amblyopia.

Vision research·2025
Same author

Efficacy of patching combined with action video games in amblyopic children aged 4-10 years: A randomised clinical trial.

Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians (Optometrists)·2025
Same journal

Computational and mathematical models in vision: Quantitative approaches to understanding visual perception.

Vision research·2026
Same journal

Complex interactions between lightness, chroma, and hue in color ensemble perception.

Vision research·2026
Same journal

Driving with autism spectrum disorder: Exploring the impact of tactile hazard warnings on gaze behavior and hazard responses.

Vision research·2026
Same journal

Early visual processing in adults with ADHD: evidence from contrast sensitivity, spatial integration, and external noise.

Vision research·2026
Same journal

Pupil reflexes generate the peripheral drift illusion due to ON/OFF motion responses.

Vision research·2026
Same journal

Perceived direction of glass patterns can flip by 90°: A neural model.

Vision research·2026
See all related articles

The attentional blink makes the second target in a rapid stream difficult to see. This visual processing disruption occurs within 0.5 seconds after the first target, affecting working memory.

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Experimental Psychology
  • Neuroscience

Background:

  • The attentional blink (AB) phenomenon describes impaired perception of a second target (T2) when it appears shortly after a first target (T1) in a Rapid Serial Visual Presentation (RSVP) stream.
  • Understanding the temporal dynamics and influencing factors of the AB is crucial for elucidating visual attention and working memory mechanisms.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the effect of Stimulus Onset Asynchrony (SOA) and target color on the attentional blink.
  • To examine how different response criteria (exact vs. approximate) influence the observed attentional blink profile.
  • To test the predictions of a two-stage model of visual working memory regarding attentional disruption.

Main Methods:

  • Participants viewed Rapid Serial Visual Presentation (RSVP) streams with varying Stimulus Onset Asynchrony (SOA) between targets.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Target colors (red vs. gray) were manipulated, and responses to the second target were recorded.
  • Performance was analyzed based on exact (zero positional error) and approximate (positional error ≤ 3 frames) identification of the second target.

    • Main Results:

    • Exact responses to the second target exhibited a typical attentional blink pattern, with performance decreasing at SOAs of 200-500 ms.
    • Approximate responses showed no attentional blink, but performance was influenced by target color (better for red) and increased with SOA.
    • These findings suggest a temporal window of attentional disruption following the first target.

    Conclusions:

    • The results support a two-stage model of visual working memory, where encoding of the first target interferes with the processing and temporal binding of the second target.
    • This disruption occurs within approximately 0.5 seconds post-first target, during which salient distractors can also occupy working memory.
    • The findings highlight the dynamic nature of attentional allocation and its impact on visual working memory encoding.