Signaling threat: how situational cues affect women in math, science, and engineering settings
Mary C Murphy1, Claude M Steele, James J Gross
1Department of Psychology, Stanford University, Jordan Hall, Bldg. 420, 450 Serra Mall, Stanford, CA 94305, USA. mmurphy@psych.stanford.edu
Abstract:
This study examined the cues hypothesis, which holds that situational cues, such as a setting's features and organization, can make potential targets vulnerable to social identity threat. Objective and subjective measures of identity threat were collected from male and female math, science, and engineering (MSE) majors who watched an MSE conference video depicting either an unbalanced ratio of men to women or a balanced ratio. Women who viewed the unbalanced video exhibited more cognitive and physiological vigilance, and reported a lower sense of belonging and less desire to participate in the conference, than did women who viewed the gender-balanced video. Men were unaffected by this situational cue. The implications for understanding vulnerability to social identity threat, particularly among women in MSE settings, are discussed.
Related Concept Videos
Stereotype Threat and Self-fulfilling Prophecies
Socioemotional Experience and Gender Development
Non-Verbal Cues
Causes of Social Behavior I: Actions and Characteristics of Individuals
Barriers to Effective Communication II
Cultural barriers:
Differences in values, beliefs, religion, knowledge, and tradition can significantly impact communication. Awareness of nonverbal cues is critical, especially when conversing with a patient from a different culture. What appears appropriate in one culture may be inappropriate in another.
Semantic barriers:
As a result of their tendency to use...
Relationship Formation

