Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Guidelines for Nursing Documentation I01:30

Guidelines for Nursing Documentation I

Quality documentation and reporting share essential characteristics that ensure they are practical and valuable resources for those who use them. These characteristics are:
Factual:  
The following points emphasize the significance of upholding accurate and unbiased documentation in healthcare.
Guidelines for Nursing Documentation II01:26

Guidelines for Nursing Documentation II

Effective documentation is an integral part of nursing practice. Here are some essential guidelines to follow when documenting patient care:
Timely documentation is crucial to ensure continuity of care for patients. Any delays in recording or reporting medical information can result in medical errors and even adverse patient outcomes. From medication administration to diagnostic test results, every detail must be accurately and promptly documented to provide the best possible care for patients.
Guidelines for Writing Outcome01:11

Guidelines for Writing Outcome

When developing expected outcomes for a patient care plan, the nurse should adhere to the following recommendations:
Patient outcomes reflect the patient's response to the goal rather than what the nurse aims to achieve. Terminology should be observable and measurable to avoid the reader's interpretation. The desired outcome should be realistic and achievable in the designated care timeframe. Expected outcomes should align with adjunctive therapies. The outcome should enhance care evaluation by...
Criteria for Causality: Bradford Hill Criteria - II01:28

Criteria for Causality: Bradford Hill Criteria - II

The Bradford Hill criteria serve as guidelines for establishing causative links in epidemiological research. Beyond Strength, Consistency, Specificity, and Temporality, key criteria also include Biological Gradient, Plausibility, Coherence, Experiment, and Analogy. These principles assist scientists in assessing the likelihood of causation in complex biological contexts. Below is a summary of these concepts:
Legal Guidelines for Documentation01:06

Legal Guidelines for Documentation

The legal guidelines for nursing documentation are essential for ensuring accurate, professional, and ethical recording of patient care. The guidelines are discussed here:
Guidelines For Measuring Vital Signs01:19

Guidelines For Measuring Vital Signs

Following these guidelines can help nurses accurately measure vital signs, assess changes in patient conditions, and provide timely treatment when necessary. Adhering closely to the guidelines ensures the accuracy and reliability of the results.
Before taking a patient's vital signs, a nurse would consider and assess the patient's comfort level and ensure appropriate equipment is available.

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Can short PROMs support valid factor-based sub-scores? Example of COMQ-12 in chronic otitis media.

PloS one·2022
Same author

Gains in Quality of Life in Chronic Otitis Media Patients After Surgery, Adjusted for Placebo Bias.

Otology & neurotology : official publication of the American Otological Society, American Neurotology Society [and] European Academy of Otology and Neurotology·2022
Same author

Psychometric characteristics of the chronic Otitis media questionnaire 12 (COMQ - 12): stability of factor structure and replicability shown by the Serbian version.

Health and quality of life outcomes·2017
Same author

The Chronic Otitis Media Benefit Inventory (COMBI): Development and Validation of a Dynamic Quality of Life Questionnaire for Chronic Ear Disease.

Otology & neurotology : official publication of the American Otological Society, American Neurotology Society [and] European Academy of Otology and Neurotology·2017
Same author

Paracingulate sulcus morphology is associated with hallucinations in the human brain.

Nature communications·2015
Same author

A causal model for longitudinal randomised trials with time-dependent non-compliance.

Statistics in medicine·2015

Related Experiment Videos

The relationship between evidence and guidelines.

Mark Haggard1

  • 1MRC Multi-Centre Otitis Media Study Group, Cambridge, UK. mark.haggard@mrc-cbu.cam.ac.uk

Otolaryngology--Head and Neck Surgery : Official Journal of American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery
|November 1, 2007
PubMed
Summary

Developing better clinical guidelines requires moving beyond just high-quality evidence. Incorporating scientific principles and healthcare context enhances the utility of evidence-based guidelines.

Related Experiment Videos

Area of Science:

  • Medical Research
  • Health Policy
  • Evidence-Based Practice

Background:

  • The link between research evidence and clinical guidelines is crucial for healthcare application.
  • Current approaches to guideline development often oversimplify the relationship between evidence and application.
  • There's a need to refine how evidence is interpreted and integrated into guidelines.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To foster a more productive relationship between scientific evidence and clinical guidelines.
  • To address limitations in current evidence-based guideline development.
  • To propose enhancements for making guidelines more professionally accepted and useful.

Main Methods:

  • This is a reflection and conceptual analysis, not an empirical study.
  • It critically examines the process of generating guidelines from research evidence.
  • It advocates for incorporating broader scientific principles and contextual understanding.

Main Results:

  • The relationship between evidence and guidelines is complex and not strictly unidirectional.
  • Overly stringent inclusion criteria for evidence can limit relevance and applicability.
  • Available evidence may be of poor quality or not directly relevant to specific clinical decisions.

Conclusions:

  • Guidelines should acknowledge a wider range of factors beyond just efficacy and effectiveness.
  • Knowledge-based medicine (KBM) necessitates a deeper understanding of scientific principles and healthcare context.
  • Integrating these elements will improve the professional acceptance and practical utility of clinical guidelines.