Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 11, 2026
06:13
Endoscopic Septoplasty with Limited Two-line Resection: Minimally Invasive Surgery for Septal Deviation
Published on: June 20, 2018
Radiofrequency turbinate reduction: a NOSE evaluation
Willard C Harrill1, Harold C Pillsbury, W Frederick McGuirt
1Carolina Ear, Nose & Throat Head and Neck Surgery Center, Hickory, NC 28601, USA. wharrill@carolinaearnosethroat.com
The Laryngoscope
|September 27, 2007
Summary
Bilateral radiofrequency inferior turbinate reduction (BRITR) alone is as effective as BRITR with septoplasty for nasal obstruction. BRITR alone offers significant cost savings, making it a preferred initial treatment option.
Area of Science:
- Otolaryngology
- Surgical Innovation
- Patient Outcomes
Background:
- Nasal obstruction is common, yet lacks consensus on optimal surgical treatment and success metrics.
- The Nasal Obstruction Symptom Evaluation (NOSE) scale provides a validated tool for assessing treatment efficacy.
- Existing literature lacks a standardized approach to defining and measuring treatment success for nasal obstruction.
Purpose of the Study:
- To prospectively compare the efficacy and cost-effectiveness of bilateral radiofrequency inferior turbinate reduction (BRITR) alone versus BRITR combined with septoplasty for nasal obstruction.
- To evaluate treatment outcomes using the validated Nasal Obstruction Symptom Evaluation (NOSE) scale.
- To determine the optimal initial surgical approach for patients with septal deviation and turbinate hypertrophy.
Main Methods:
- Prospective study comparing two surgical groups: BRITR only vs. BRITR with septoplasty.
- Utilized the Nasal Obstruction Symptom Evaluation (NOSE) scale for data collection at baseline, 3 months, and 6 months post-operation.
- Included patients with nasal obstruction due to combined septal deviation and turbinate hypertrophy who failed medical therapy.
Main Results:
- Both treatment groups (BRITR alone and BRITR with septoplasty) showed significant improvement in NOSE scores at 6 months.
- No statistically significant difference in postoperative improvement was observed between the two surgical approaches.
- BRITR alone demonstrated significant cost savings compared to the combined BRITR and septoplasty procedure.
Conclusions:
- Bilateral radiofrequency inferior turbinate reduction (BRITR) alone is a clinically effective treatment for nasal obstruction.
- BRITR alone should be considered an initial treatment option for patients with septal deviation and turbinate hypertrophy unresponsive to medical therapy.
- The findings support BRITR as a cost-effective alternative to combined septoplasty and turbinate reduction.
