Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

The neural basis of cognitive processing: A review and a speculative architecture.

Brain and cognition·2025
Same author

Multimodal mobile brain and body imaging for quantification of dance motor sequence learning.

MethodsX·2025
Same author

Under pressure in the Eriksen flanker task.

Biological psychology·2025
Same author

Explicit metrics for implicit emotions: investigating physiological and gaze indices of learner emotions.

Frontiers in psychology·2024
Same author

Working Memory Maintenance of Visual and Auditory Spatial Information Relies on Supramodal Neural Codes in the Dorsal Frontoparietal Cortex.

Brain sciences·2024
Same author

Timing of transcranial direct current stimulation at M1 does not affect motor sequence learning.

Heliyon·2024

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jul 11, 2026

Applying Incongruent Visual-Tactile Stimuli during Object Transfer with Vibro-Tactile Feedback
05:43

Applying Incongruent Visual-Tactile Stimuli during Object Transfer with Vibro-Tactile Feedback

Published on: May 23, 2019

Asymmetrical learning between a tactile and visual serial RT task.

Elger L Abrahamse1, Rob H J van der Lubbe, Willem B Verwey

  • 1Cognitive Psychology and Ergonomics, Faculty of Behavioural Sciences, Universiteit Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands. e.l.abrahamse@gw.utwente.nl

Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology (2006)
|September 27, 2007
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Implicit sequence learning occurs in tactile tasks, though less effectively than in visual tasks. This suggests that sequence learning involves modality-specific components, particularly for visual stimuli.

More Related Videos

Testing Sensory and Multisensory Function in Children with Autism Spectrum Disorder
09:13

Testing Sensory and Multisensory Function in Children with Autism Spectrum Disorder

Published on: April 22, 2015

Using Virtual Reality to Transfer Motor Skill Knowledge from One Hand to Another
05:12

Using Virtual Reality to Transfer Motor Skill Knowledge from One Hand to Another

Published on: September 18, 2017

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jul 11, 2026

Applying Incongruent Visual-Tactile Stimuli during Object Transfer with Vibro-Tactile Feedback
05:43

Applying Incongruent Visual-Tactile Stimuli during Object Transfer with Vibro-Tactile Feedback

Published on: May 23, 2019

Testing Sensory and Multisensory Function in Children with Autism Spectrum Disorder
09:13

Testing Sensory and Multisensory Function in Children with Autism Spectrum Disorder

Published on: April 22, 2015

Using Virtual Reality to Transfer Motor Skill Knowledge from One Hand to Another
05:12

Using Virtual Reality to Transfer Motor Skill Knowledge from One Hand to Another

Published on: September 18, 2017

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Neuroscience
  • Human Factors

Background:

  • Implicit learning in the serial reaction-time task is often considered motor-based and modality-independent.
  • Prior research has predominantly utilized visual stimuli, limiting understanding of other sensory modalities.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate implicit sequence learning using tactile stimuli presented to the fingers.
  • To compare tactile sequence learning with traditional visual sequence learning under controlled conditions.
  • To explore cross-modal transfer of sequence learning between visual and tactile modalities.

Main Methods:

  • Participants performed a serial reaction-time task with sequences presented either visually or tactilely.
  • Learning was assessed by comparing reaction times to sequential versus random stimuli.
  • Cross-modal transfer was evaluated by training in one modality and testing in the other.

Main Results:

  • Significant sequence learning was observed in the tactile modality, albeit to a lesser extent than in the visual modality.
  • Partial transfer of learning occurred in both directions (visual-to-tactile and tactile-to-visual).
  • Findings suggest a stimulus-specific component in visual sequence learning that may be absent in tactile sequence learning.

Conclusions:

  • Implicit sequence learning is not exclusive to the visual domain and can occur through tactile stimulation.
  • The degree of implicit sequence learning may vary across sensory modalities.
  • Sequence learning likely involves both modality-general (motor) and modality-specific (perceptual) components.