Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Parallel MRI reconstruction using variance partitioning regularization.

Fa-Hsuan Lin1, Fu-Nien Wang, Seppo P Ahlfors

  • 1Institute of Biomedical Engineering, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan. fhlin@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu

Magnetic Resonance in Medicine
|September 28, 2007
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Closed-loop stimulation modulates attention shifting in children.

Nature neuroscience·2026
Same author

Conductivity Deviations as Virtual Sources in Magnetoencephalography.

Brain topography·2026
Same author

Quantifying cerebellar signal detectability in MEG and EEG in epilepsy using anatomically informed source modeling.

NeuroImage·2026
Same author

A Digital Anatomical Atlas of the Human Cerebellum at Subfolial Resolution.

Human brain mapping·2026
Same author

Early Maturation of Functional Connectivity within Dorsal Brain Networks.

Brain connectivity·2026
Same author

Tissue-type Differences in Focused Ultrasound and Microbubble-mediated Drug Delivery to the Brain Exist at Vessel Level.

Theranostics·2025
Same journal

A Comparison of Tissue Property Values Estimated Using Conventional Cardiac MRF and MT-Cardiac MRF.

Magnetic resonance in medicine·2026
Same journal

Dependence of the Extra-Cellular Diffusion Coefficient on the Fractions of Neurites and Cell Bodies in Gray Matter.

Magnetic resonance in medicine·2026
Same journal

Triple-Pulse <sup>23</sup>Na MRI Sequence (TriNa) for Simultaneous Acquisition of Spin-Density-Weighted and Fluid-Attenuated Images.

Magnetic resonance in medicine·2026
Same journal

Evaluation of Phantom Doping Materials in Quantitative Susceptibility Mapping.

Magnetic resonance in medicine·2026
Same journal

Design of an 8-Channel Transmit 32-Channel Receive 11.7T Head Coil and Evaluation of SNR Gains.

Magnetic resonance in medicine·2026
Same journal

The Potential for Absolute Temperature Imaging Based on Brain Metabolites Using an FID-Shifting Approach in Gradient Echo Planar Spectroscopic Imaging (GREPSI).

Magnetic resonance in medicine·2026
See all related articles

This study introduces Variance Partitioning Regularization (VPR), a faster and more reliable method for estimating regularization parameters in parallel MRI. VPR improves image quality by reducing noise amplification in accelerated MRI scans.

Area of Science:

  • Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI)
  • Medical Imaging
  • Biomedical Engineering

Background:

  • Parallel imaging enhances MRI spatiotemporal resolution using multiple receivers.
  • L-curve Tikhonov regularization mitigates noise but suffers from long computation times and poor robustness, especially in low SNR acquisitions.
  • Estimating regularization parameters is a bottleneck in regularized image reconstruction.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To develop a computationally efficient and robust method for estimating regularization parameters in parallel MRI.
  • To address the limitations of existing L-curve regularization parameter estimation techniques.
  • To improve image quality in accelerated MRI by suppressing noise amplification.

Main Methods:

  • Proposed Variance Partitioning Regularization (VPR) method for estimating regularization parameters.

Related Experiment Videos

  • VPR partitions the variance of the noise-whitened encoding matrix based on estimated SNR of aliased pixels.
  • Evaluated VPR's computational efficiency and robustness across various MRI matrix sizes and acceleration rates.

    • Main Results:

    • VPR improves computational efficiency by 2-5 fold compared to traditional methods.
    • The method demonstrates robustness across repetitive measurements, even in low SNR conditions.
    • VPR effectively suppresses noise amplification in parallel MRI reconstructions.

    Conclusions:

    • The Variance Partitioning Regularization (VPR) method offers a computationally efficient and robust solution for regularization parameter estimation in parallel MRI.
    • VPR enhances image quality in both static and dynamic MRI experiments, including anatomical and functional imaging.
    • This method significantly improves the practical application of parallel imaging techniques for accelerated MRI acquisition.