Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 11, 2026

Holistic Facial Composite Creation and Subsequent Video Line-up Eyewitness Identification Paradigm
Published on: December 24, 2015
Source misattributions may increase the accuracy of source judgments
Keith B Lyle1, Marcia K Johnson
1Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences, University of Louisville, Louisville, Kentucky 40292, USA. keith.lyle@louisville.edu
Abstract:
Misattribution of remembered information from one source to another is commonly associated with false memories, but we demonstrate that it also may underlie memories that accord with past events. Participants imagined drawings of objects in four different locations. For each, a drawing of a similarly shaped object was seen in the same location, a different location, or not seen. When tested on memory for objects' origin (seen/imagined) and location, more false "seen" responses, but also more correct location responses, were given to imagined objects if a similar object had been seen, versus not seen, in the same location. We argue that misattribution of feature information (e.g., shape, location) from seen objects to similar imagined ones increased false memories of seeing objects but also increased correct location memories, provided the misattributed location matched the imagined objects' location. Thus, consistent with the source-monitoring framework, imperfect source-attribution processes underlie false and true memories.
Related Concept Videos
Fundamental Attribution Error
Theory of Attribution I: Correspondent Inference Theory
Attribution Theory
Attribution
Correspondence Bias
Eyewitness Memory
One such error is memory distortion, which occurs because human memory does not function like a...