Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Lessons learned from cross-validating alignments between large anatomical ontologies.

Songmao Zhang1, Olivier Bodenreider

  • 1Institute of Mathematics, Academy of Mathematics and Systems Science Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, PR China.

Studies in Health Technology and Informatics
|October 4, 2007
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Dual Dynamic Cross-Linked Epoxy Vitrimers Used for Strong, Detachable, and Reworkable Adhesives.

ACS applied materials & interfaces·2024
Same author

Two complementary AI approaches for predicting UMLS semantic group assignment: heuristic reasoning and deep learning.

Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA·2023
Same author

A practical strategy to use the ICD-11 for morbidity coding in the United States without a clinical modification.

Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA·2023
Same author

A deep learning approach to identify missing is-a relations in SNOMED CT.

Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA·2022
Same author

Modulation of poly (acrylic acid) hydrogels with κ-carrageenan for high-performance quasi-solid Al-air batteries.

International journal of biological macromolecules·2022
Same author

Comparing the representation of medicinal products in RxNorm and SNOMED CT - Consequences on interoperability.

CEUR workshop proceedings·2022
Same journal

A GenAI Pipeline for Violinist Kinematic Data Management.

Studies in health technology and informatics·2026
Same journal

AMAL-For-Qatar: A Comprehensive AI Ecosystem for Fetal Ultrasound Analysis - Project Overview and Achievements.

Studies in health technology and informatics·2026
Same journal

Longitudinal Treatment-Aware Multimodal AI for Dermatology: A Scoping Review.

Studies in health technology and informatics·2026
Same journal

Predicting Postpartum Depression Using Imbalance-Aware Machine Learning.

Studies in health technology and informatics·2026
Same journal

Validation of Deep-Learning Models for Autosegmentation of Brain Metastases.

Studies in health technology and informatics·2026
Same journal

Delay-Dependent Gating in Modular RNNs.

Studies in health technology and informatics·2026
See all related articles

The Foundational Model of Anatomy and GALEN ontologies were compared using three systems. AOAS showed better precision for anatomical ontology alignment, while FALCON and PRIOR identified more errors.

Area of Science:

  • Biomedical Informatics
  • Computational Biology
  • Ontology Engineering

Background:

  • Ontologies are crucial for organizing and sharing biomedical knowledge.
  • Comparing anatomical ontologies aids in understanding their structure and content.
  • Automated ontology alignment systems are essential for large-scale knowledge integration.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate and compare the performance of three ontology alignment systems (AOAS, FALCON, PRIOR).
  • To assess the alignment quality between the Foundational Model of Anatomy (FMA) and GALEN ontologies.
  • To analyze the strengths and weaknesses of different alignment approaches in the context of anatomical data.

Main Methods:

  • Utilized the Ontology Alignment Evaluation Initiative (OAEI) 2006 campaign framework.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Generated mappings using AOAS, FALCON, and PRIOR systems.
  • Employed overlap computation, manual review of 2,000 mappings, and structural validation for analysis.

    • Main Results:

    • AOAS produced 3,132 mappings, FALCON 2,518, and PRIOR 2,589.
    • Generic systems FALCON and PRIOR exhibited a high rate of false positives and false negatives.
    • AOAS, using a domain-specific lexical model, achieved higher precision but missed synonyms and misspellings.

    Conclusions:

    • AOAS demonstrates superior precision in anatomical ontology alignment compared to generic systems.
    • The choice of alignment strategy significantly impacts the accuracy and completeness of ontology mappings.
    • Domain-specific models enhance precision but require careful handling of lexical variations in anatomical ontologies.