Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Related Concept Videos

Bias in Epidemiological Studies

Bias in Epidemiological Studies

Biases can arise at various stages of research, from study design and data collection to analysis and interpretation. Recognizing and addressing these biases is essential to ensure the validity and reliability of epidemiological findings.Broadly speaking, biases in epidemiology fall into three main categories: selection bias, information bias, and confounding. A more detailed description of possible biases is:

Bias

Bias

Bias refers to any tendency that prevents a question from being considered unprejudiced. In research, bias occurs when one outcome or answer is selected or encouraged over others in sampling or testing. Bias can occur during any research phase, including study design, data collection, analysis, and publication.
In statistics, a sampling bias is created when a sample is collected from a population, and some members of the population are not as likely to be chosen as others (remember, each member...

Genetic Screens

Genetic Screens

Genetic screens are tools used to identify genes and mutations responsible for phenotypes of interest. Genetic screens help identify individuals or a group of people at risk of developing genetic diseases and help them with early intervention, targeted therapy, and reproductive options.
Forward genetic screens
Forward or “classical” genetic screens involve creating random mutations in an organism’s DNA using radiation, mutagens, or insertion of additional bases, which result in visible changes...

Confirmation Biases

Confirmation Biases

The confirmation bias is the tendency to focus on information that confirms our existing beliefs and ignore information that is inconsistent with our expectations. For example, if you think that your professor is not very nice, you notice all of the instances of rude behavior exhibited by the professor while ignoring the countless pleasant interactions he is involved in on a daily basis. Have you ever fallen prey to the confirmation bias, either as the source or target of such bias?

Blind Procedures

Blind Procedures

Ideally, the people who observe and record the children’s behavior are unaware of who was assigned to the experimental or control group, in order to control for experimenter bias. Experimenter bias refers to the possibility that a researcher’s expectations might skew the results of the study. Remember, conducting an experiment requires a lot of planning, and the people involved in the research project have a vested interest in supporting their hypotheses. If the observers knew which child was...

Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches

Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches

Biopharmaceutical studies constitute a vital field aiming to enhance drug delivery methods and refine therapeutic approaches, drawing upon diverse interdisciplinary knowledge. In research methodologies, the choice between controlled and non-controlled studies significantly influences the study's reliability and accuracy.
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast, controlled...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

Correction: Somatic morbidity in bipolar disorders.

International journal of bipolar disorders·2026

Same author

Long-Term Opioid Therapy Tapering and Risk of Substance Use Disorder and Overdose: Differences by Opioid Dose and Duration.

Journal of general internal medicine·2026

Same author

Measured and Estimated Glomerular Filtration Rates and Risk of Adverse Health Outcomes.

JAMA·2026

Same author

Somatic morbidity in bipolar disorders.

International journal of bipolar disorders·2026

Same author

Evaluation of clinical utility in emulated clinical trials.

European journal of epidemiology·2026

Same author

Inflammatory and cholesterol risks and rates of major cardiovascular events among patients with atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease in routine care.

European heart journal open·2026

Search research articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jul 11, 2026

A Machine Learning Approach to Design an Efficient Selective Screening of Mild Cognitive Impairment

A Machine Learning Approach to Design an Efficient Selective Screening of Mild Cognitive Impairment

Published on: January 11, 2020

On informative detection bias in screening studies.

Arvid Sjölander¹, Keith Humphreys, Juni Palmgren

¹Department of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden. arvid.sjolander@meb.ki.se

Statistics in Medicine

|October 9, 2007

Summary

Estimating hormone replacement therapy's (HRT) breast cancer impact is complex due to detection bias. A new sensitivity analysis addresses this bias, showing prior data restriction methods are invalid for accurate hormone replacement therapy (HRT) effect estimation.

More Related Videos

siRNA Screening to Identify Ubiquitin and Ubiquitin-like System Regulators of Biological Pathways in Cultured Mammalian Cells

siRNA Screening to Identify Ubiquitin and Ubiquitin-like System Regulators of Biological Pathways in Cultured Mammalian Cells

Published on: May 24, 2014

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jul 11, 2026

A Machine Learning Approach to Design an Efficient Selective Screening of Mild Cognitive Impairment

A Machine Learning Approach to Design an Efficient Selective Screening of Mild Cognitive Impairment

Published on: January 11, 2020

siRNA Screening to Identify Ubiquitin and Ubiquitin-like System Regulators of Biological Pathways in Cultured Mammalian Cells

siRNA Screening to Identify Ubiquitin and Ubiquitin-like System Regulators of Biological Pathways in Cultured Mammalian Cells

Published on: May 24, 2014

Area of Science:

Epidemiology
Biostatistics
Causal Inference

Background:

Hormone replacement therapy (HRT) use is linked to breast cancer, but accurately estimating this effect is challenging.
Detection bias, where HRT influences cancer diagnosis rather than true incidence, complicates causal inference.
Standard methods like stratification fail when screening patterns and cancer status share common causes.

Purpose of the Study:

To address detection bias in estimating the causal effect of hormone replacement therapy (HRT) on breast cancer.
To propose a valid sensitivity analysis method for handling detection bias.
To evaluate the validity of existing data restriction approaches.

Main Methods:

Development of a novel sensitivity analysis framework to quantify detection bias.
Comparison of the proposed method with existing techniques, including data stratification and restriction.
Application of methods to simulated and real-world epidemiological data.

Main Results:

The HRT effect on observed cancer diagnosis may differ significantly from the effect on true cancer incidence.
Standard stratification methods are demonstrated to be invalid under common causes of screening and disease.
The proposed sensitivity analysis provides a more robust approach to assessing HRT's true impact on breast cancer.

Conclusions:

Detection bias is a critical issue in HRT and breast cancer research, requiring advanced causal inference methods.
The proposed sensitivity analysis is a valid tool for addressing detection bias.
Previous data restriction methods for handling detection bias are shown to be inadequate.