Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 11, 2026

Shrinkage of Dental Composite in Simulated Cavity Measured with Digital Image Correlation
Published on: July 21, 2014
Axial shrinkage-stress depends upon both C-factor and composite mass
David C Watts1, Julian D Satterthwaite
1School of Dentistry and Photon Science Institute, University of Manchester, Higher Cambridge Street, Manchester, UK.
Objectives:
To measure and then mathematically model polymerization stress-dependence upon systematic variations of C-factor (bonded/unbonded area ratio) for the Bioman instrument [1], recording stress by free cantilever-beam deflection; compliance 1.5 microm/MPa.
Methods:
A light-cured resin-composite (RZD103; Ivoclar) with 57% (v/v) 450 nm filler was studied. Facing surfaces: glass slab and steel rod-end, constituting the Bioman test chamber, being perpendicular to the measured axial stress-direction, were varied: (a) with rod-diameters (phi), from 1 to 10mm in 1mm increments (with 0.8mm gap height); and then (b) with gap heights (h) in 16 steps from 0.05 to 1.50mm (with phi=10mm). For each h and phi combination, giving C-factors ranging from 0.6 to 100, shrinkage-stress was recorded for 1h from start of 40s irradiation at 600 mW cm(-2) for photo-polymerization at 23 degrees C (n=3). Shrinkage-stress (S(sigma)) was plotted directly as functions of h, phi, and C and also per unit composite mass, (S(sigma)g(-1)). ANOVA and Tukey's statistics were applied.
Results:
Series A-diameter variation; with C-factor increasing from 0.6 to 6, gave an exact exponential decrease in S(sigma) from 45 to 8 MPa. Series B-height variation; with C-factor increasing from 3 to 100, gave increasing S(sigma) from 1 to 8 MPa. Since composite mass played an equally dominant role, plots of stress-variations per unit composite mass, (S(sigma)g(-1)) separated these effects, confirming progressive off-axial stress-relief with increasing h.
Significance:
(i) Values of h=0.8 and phi=10mm, recommended [1] for Bioman use, were confirmed as appropriate. Every lab instrument for measuring S(sigma) necessarily embodies specific C-factors and compliance values in the instrument design. (ii) Configuration (C) factor is recognized as an important parameter affecting manifestation of shrinkage-stress within restorative cavities and luting gaps. However, the restorative mass must equally be considered when translating shrinkage-science into specific clinical recommendations.
Related Concept Videos
Relation between Poisson's ratio, Modulus of Elasticity and Modulus of Rigidity
Components of Stress
Interestingly, the hidden cube faces also experience these stresses, equal and opposite to those on the...
Bending of Members Made of Several Materials
Hooke's Law determines stress in each material, stating that stress is proportional to strain but varies due to each material's...
Stress Concentrations in Circular Shafts
Eccentric Axial Loading in a Plane of Symmetry
Stress: General Loading Conditions
The shearing force, possessing potential directionality within the plane of the section, is simplified into two component forces running parallel to the x and y axes.

