Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 11, 2026

09:21
Optimized Management of Endovascular Treatment for Acute Ischemic Stroke
Published on: January 18, 2018
Alberta Stroke Program Early CT Scoring of CT perfusion in early stroke visualization and assessment
R I Aviv1, J Mandelcorn, S Chakraborty
1Division of Neuroradiology, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada. richardaviv@lineone.net
AJNR. American Journal of Neuroradiology
|October 9, 2007
Summary
Cerebral blood volume ASPECTS on CT perfusion is as effective as noncontrast CT ASPECTS for predicting stroke outcomes. It may also better identify patients likely to achieve major neurologic improvement.
Area of Science:
- Neuroradiology
- Stroke Imaging
- Cerebrovascular Diseases
Background:
- Alberta Stroke Program Early CT Score (ASPECTS) aids infarct extent calculation in middle cerebral artery infarcts.
- Published thresholds for noncontrast CT (NCCT) ASPECTS exist, but early ischemic signs are challenging to detect.
- Hypothesized that distinct ASPECTS thresholds for CT perfusion (CTP) parameters may better predict acute stroke outcomes than NCCT.
Purpose of the Study:
- To determine if different ASPECTS thresholds for CTP parameters compared to NCCT exist.
- To evaluate the superiority of CTP-derived ASPECTS in predicting clinical and radiologic outcomes in acute stroke.
- To identify optimal ASPECTS thresholds for predicting stroke outcomes.
Main Methods:
- 36 acute stroke patients within 3 hours of symptom onset underwent NCCT and CTP.
- Three neuroradiologists blindly assigned ASPECTS to NCCT and CTP datasets.
- Receiver operating characteristic curves were used to derive optimal thresholds for outcome prediction, with treatment response defined as major neurologic improvement.
Main Results:
- Cerebral blood volume (CBV) ASPECTS and NCCT ASPECTS showed similar radiologic correlations (0.6 and 0.5).
- A NCCT ASPECT threshold of 7 and CBV ASPECTS threshold of 8 discriminated patients with poor follow-up scans and unfavorable modified Rankin scores (mRS).
- CBV ASPECTS, unlike NCCT ASPECTS, predicted major neurologic improvement (P = .02), with no patients with CBV ASPECTS <8 achieving good clinical outcome.
Conclusions:
- CBV ASPECTS is equivalent to NCCT ASPECTS for predicting radiologic stroke outcomes.
- CBV ASPECTS may offer additional benefit in predicting patients likely to achieve major neurologic improvement.
- CBV ASPECTS thresholds may be superior to NCCT ASPECTS for predicting acute stroke outcomes.
