Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Dynamics systems vs. optimal control--a unifying view.

Stefan Schaal1, Peyman Mohajerian, Auke Ijspeert

  • 1Computer Science & Neuroscience, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90089-2905, USA. sschaal@usc.edu

Progress in Brain Research
|October 11, 2007
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Swimming with robots: investigating fish locomotion, sensing, and schooling behavior with robotic swimmers.

Nature communications·2026
Same author

Centralized brain networks controlling antennal grooming coordination.

Nature communications·2026
Same author

Optimized user-guided motion control of modular robots.

Nature communications·2025
Same author

RoboBallet: Planning for multirobot reaching with graph neural networks and reinforcement learning.

Science robotics·2025
Same author

Adaptive Negative Damping Control for User-Dependent Multi-Terrain Walking Assistance With a Hip Exoskeleton.

IEEE ... International Conference on Rehabilitation Robotics : [proceedings]·2025
Same author

Investigating the effect of morphology on the terrestrial gaits of amphibious fish using a reconfigurable robot.

Bioinspiration & biomimetics·2025
Same journal

Preface.

Progress in brain research·2025
Same journal

Mindfulness and meditation: Promoting emotional and cognitive health.

Progress in brain research·2025
Same journal

Cognitive stimulation enhancing memory and mental function.

Progress in brain research·2025
Same journal

The science behind non-pharmacological interventions.

Progress in brain research·2025
Same journal

Technology-assisted interventions for neuropsychiatric disorders.

Progress in brain research·2025
Same journal

Ethical consideration in non-pharmacological treatments for neuropsychiatric disorders.

Progress in brain research·2025
See all related articles

This study introduces a unifying computational framework for motor control, integrating dynamic systems and optimal control theories. This novel approach models self-organization and optimization, advancing understanding of movement control.

Area of Science:

  • Computational Neuroscience
  • Robotics
  • Biomechanics

Background:

  • Motor control research traditionally uses two distinct frameworks: dynamic systems and optimal control.
  • Dynamic systems view motor control as self-organization, often using nonlinear differential equations.
  • Optimal control theories posit motor control optimizes principles like energy efficiency or task accuracy.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To develop a unified computational modeling framework for motor control.
  • To bridge the gap between the dynamic systems and optimal control approaches.
  • To demonstrate a generalizable model applicable to diverse motor control phenomena.

Main Methods:

  • Developed a novel computational approach for motor control modeling.
  • Integrated principles from both dynamic systems and optimal control theories.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Applied the framework to analyze behavioral experiments, theoretical studies, and robotics.

    • Main Results:

    • The proposed framework successfully unifies self-organization (dynamic systems) and optimization (optimal control).
    • Demonstrated the model's ability to represent both emergent behaviors and goal-directed movement optimization.
    • Showcased the framework's versatility across different experimental and theoretical contexts.

    Conclusions:

    • A simple, general computational framework can reconcile seemingly opposing motor control theories.
    • This unifying approach offers new perspectives on existing motor control research.
    • The framework facilitates revisiting and reinterpreting previous findings in computational motor control.