Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Population genetic screening.

Sylvia A Metcalfe1, Kristine Barlow-Stewart, Martin B Delatycki

  • 1Genetics Education and Health Research, Murdoch Childrens Research Institute, Melbourne, Victoria. sylvia.metcalfe@mcri.edu.au

Australian Family Physician
|October 11, 2007
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

The Prevalence and Risk Factors for at-Risk MASH and Advanced Liver Fibrosis in People With Metabolic Risk Factors in Primary Care.

Alimentary pharmacology & therapeutics·2026
Same author

Oncologist and General Practitioner Perspectives of Telehealth-Delivered Colorectal Cancer Survivorship Care.

Psycho-oncology·2026
Same author

Timeliness of Care and Treatment Patterns for Pancreatic Cancer in Victoria, Australia: Comparison With Optimal Care Pathways Targets.

ANZ journal of surgery·2026
Same author

Advancing models of survivorship care research: an overview and recommendations for future studies.

Journal of the National Cancer Institute·2026
Same author

"I don't think I even thought of myself" A mixed-methods study of family experiences of trio germline whole genome sequencing in newly diagnosed childhood cancer.

British journal of cancer·2026
Same author

Pharmacogenetic-Guided Antidepressant Prescribing in Adolescents (PGx-GAP): Study Protocol for a Randomized Controlled Trial.

Journal of personalized medicine·2026
Same journal

Occupational violence and staff safety in general practice.

Australian family physician·2018
Same journal

You should get that mole checked out: Ethical and legal considerations of the unsolicited clinical opinion.

Australian family physician·2018
Same journal

Understanding the decision to commence a dose administration aid.

Australian family physician·2018
Same journal

Psychological distress and risky sexual behaviours among women aged 16-25 years in Victoria, Australia.

Australian family physician·2018
Same journal

A mixed-methods feasibility study of routinely weighing patients in general practice to aid weight management.

Australian family physician·2018
Same journal

The Australian Mid-West Coastal Marine Wound Infections Study.

Australian family physician·2018
See all related articles

General practitioners play a key role in Australia's genetic screening programs, offering prenatal and newborn screenings. They provide crucial counseling for increased risk results, ensuring informed decision-making for expectant parents.

Area of Science:

  • Medical Genetics
  • Public Health Screening

Background:

  • Australian genetic screening focuses on prenatal carrier status (thalassaemia), fetal chromosomal abnormalities, neural tube defects, and newborn conditions.
  • Current programs aim to identify genetic and some non-genetic risk factors during pregnancy.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To outline Australia's genetic screening programs.
  • To define the general practitioner's (GP) role in offering prenatal screening, including non-genetic factors.
  • To promote best practices in genetic screening and counseling.

Main Methods:

  • Review of existing genetic screening protocols in Australia.
  • Description of the GP's responsibilities in patient counseling and risk assessment.
  • Emphasis on informed decision-making and follow-up testing.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • GPs are integral to offering prenatal and newborn genetic screening.
  • Effective counseling is essential when delivering increased risk results.
  • Follow-up testing is standard for elevated risk findings.

Conclusions:

  • GPs facilitate informed decision-making in genetic screening through counseling.
  • The evolving understanding of genetic contributions to disease will likely expand the GP's role in population genetic screening.
  • Continued professional development is necessary for GPs to adapt to new genetic testing technologies.