Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 10, 2026

13:05
Ratiometric Imaging of Extracellular pH in Dental Biofilms
Published on: March 9, 2016
Radiopacity of endodontic materials on film and a digital sensor
Brian J Rasimick1, Rinal P Shah, Barry Lee Musikant
1Essential Dental Systems, 89 Leuning Street, South Hackensack, NJ 07606, USA. brasimick@edsdental.com
Journal of Endodontics
|October 13, 2007
Summary
Digital sensors and dental film show different radiopacity for endodontic materials. Four materials varied over 10%, with InnoEndo showing over 40% difference, possibly due to barium fillers.
Area of Science:
- Dental materials science
- Radiology
- Endodontics
Background:
- Radiopacity is a critical property for endodontic materials, influencing their visibility on radiographs.
- Accurate assessment of radiopacity is essential for clinical evaluation and material selection.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the radiographic appearance and radiopacity of 12 endodontic materials using dental film and a digital sensor.
- To quantify differences in radiopacity measurements between the two imaging systems.
Main Methods:
- Radiographic comparison of 12 endodontic materials using Kodak Ultra-speed D film and a Gendex eHD digital sensor.
- Materials were radiographed with an aluminum alloy 1100 stepwedge for reference.
- Radiopacity was determined by converting grayscale values to absorbance and comparing with the stepwedge to find equivalent millimeters of Al 1100.
Main Results:
- Significant differences in radiopacity were found based on imaging system, material, and their interaction (p < 0.001).
- Four of the 12 materials exhibited over a 10% difference in radiopacity between film and digital sensor.
- InnoEndo showed a radiopacity difference exceeding 40% when measured on the digital sensor compared to film.
Conclusions:
- The choice of imaging system (dental film vs. digital sensor) significantly impacts the measured radiopacity of endodontic materials.
- Barium fillers in materials like InnoEndo may contribute to the observed discrepancies in radiopacity measurements.
- Clinicians should be aware of potential variations in radiopacity assessment depending on the radiographic technique used.

